Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27771780›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2017

Comprehensive detection and identification of bacterial DNA in the blood of patients with sepsis and healthy volunteers using next-generation sequencing method - the observation of DNAemia.

T Gosiewski, A H Ludwig-Galezowska, K Huminska, A Sroka-Oleksiak, P Radkowski, D Salamon, J Wojciechowicz, M Kus-Slowinska, M Bulanda, P P Wolkow

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 111 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
111citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

111 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Clinical utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in precision diagnosis of infectious diseases: a retrospective study based on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid, blood, and cerebrospinal fluid.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Secretory phospholipase ACommunications biology · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Pathological Alterations in Human Blood Microbiome-An Updated Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025
    Review
  11. Cross-sectional Study: Diagnostic Accuracy of Next-generation Sequencing in a Tertiary Care Intensive Care Unit.Indian journal of critical care medicine : peer-reviewed, official publication of Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Pregnancy Loss Caused by Repeated Unexplained Infections in the Second Trimester.Maternal-fetal medicine (Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.) · 2025
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. HPD-Kit: a comprehensive toolkit for pathogen detection and analysis.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

51 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T GosiewskiDepartment of Microbiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
A H Ludwig-GalezowskaCenter for Medical Genomics OMICRON, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 7C Kopernika Str., 31-034, Krakow, Poland.
K HuminskaGenomic Laboratory, DNA Research Center, Poznan, Poland.
A Sroka-OleksiakDepartment of Microbiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
P RadkowskiCenter for Medical Genomics OMICRON, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 7C Kopernika Str., 31-034, Krakow, Poland.
D SalamonDepartment of Microbiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
J WojciechowiczGenomic Laboratory, DNA Research Center, Poznan, Poland.
M Kus-SlowinskaGenomic Laboratory, DNA Research Center, Poznan, Poland.
M BulandaDepartment of Microbiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.
P P WolkowCenter for Medical Genomics OMICRON, Jagiellonian University Medical College, 7C Kopernika Str., 31-034, Krakow, Poland. pawel.wolkow@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9322-5545
Jagiellonian University · PLAdam Mickiewicz University in Poznań · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blood is considered to be a sterile microenvironment, in which bacteria appear only periodically. Previously used methods allowed only for the detection of either viable bacteria with low sensitivity or selected species of bacteria. The Next-Generation Sequencing method (NGS) enables the identification of all bacteria in the sample with their taxonomic classification. We used NGS for the analysis of blood samples from healthy volunteers (n = 23) and patients with sepsis (n = 62) to check whether any bacterial DNA exists in the blood of healthy people and to identify bacterial taxonomic profile in the blood of septic patients. The presence of bacterial DNA was found both in septic and healthy subjects; however, bacterial diversity was significantly different (P = 0.002) between the studied groups. Among healthy volunteers, a significant predominance of anaerobic bacteria (76.2 %), of which most were bacteria of the order Bifidobacteriales (73.0 %), was observed. In sepsis, the majority of detected taxa belonged to aerobic or microaerophilic microorganisms (75.1 %). The most striking difference was seen in the case of Actinobacteria phyla, the abundance of which was decreased in sepsis (P < 0.001) and Proteobacteria phyla which was decreased in the healthy volunteers (P < 0.001). Our research shows that bacterial DNA can be detected in the blood of healthy people and that its taxonomic composition is different from the one seen in septic patients. Detection of bacterial DNA in the blood of healthy people may suggest that bacteria continuously translocate into the blood, but not always cause sepsis; this observation can be called DNAemia.

Indexed as

Blood Chemical AnalysisHealthy VolunteersSepsisAgedBacteriaBacteriological TechniquesBiodiversityDNA, BacterialFemaleHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMaleMiddle AgedDNA, Bacterial

Identifiers

PMID27771780
PMCPMC5253159
OpenAlexW2539186102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.