Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27770807›Full record

SynthesisImplementation science : IS2016

Barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review of qualitative evidence.

Tim Stokes, Elizabeth J Shaw, Janette Camosso-Stefinovic, Mari Imamura, Lovney Kanguru, Julia Hussein

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 47 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
47citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
12.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

47 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 90 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. The FemTech revolution: Unlocking the potential of new technology for optimizing pregnancy outcomes in low- and middle-income countries and remote areas.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Effectiveness of dissemination strategies of maternal clinical guidelines: A narrative review.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tim StokesDepartment of General Practice and Rural Health, Dunedin School of Medicine, University of Otago, PO Box 56, Dunedin, 9054, New Zealand. tim.stokes@otago.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-1127-1952
Elizabeth J ShawNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE), Manchester, UK.
Janette Camosso-Stefinovic, Munich, Germany.
Mari ImamuraThe Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Lovney KanguruThe Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
Julia HusseinThe Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.
University of Aberdeen · GBNational Institute for Health and Care Excellence · GBUniversity of Otago · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal mortality remains a major international health problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMIC), and most could have been prevented by quality improvement interventions already demonstrated to be effective, such as clinical guideline implementation strategies. The aim of this systematic review was to synthesise qualitative evidence on guideline implementation strategies to improve obstetric care practice in LMIC in order to identify barriers and enablers to their successful implementation.

methodsWe searched MEDLINE and CINAHL databases for articles reporting research findings on barriers and enablers to guideline implementation strategies in obstetric care practice in LMIC. We conducted a "best fit" framework synthesis of the included studies. We used an organisational "stages of change" model as our a priori framework for the synthesis.

resultsNine studies were included: all were based in Sub-Saharan Africa and in hospital health care facilities. The majority of studies (seven) evaluated one particular guideline implementation strategy: clinical audit and feedback (both criterion-based audit and maternal death reviews), and a minority (two) evaluated educational interventions. A range of barriers and enablers to successful guideline implementation was identified. A key finding of the framework synthesis was that "high" and "low" intrinsic health care professional motivation are overall enablers and barriers, respectively, of successful guideline implementation. We developed a modified "stages of change" model to take account of these findings.

conclusionWe have identified a number of quality improvement processes that are amenable to change at limited or no additional cost, although some identified barriers may be difficult to address without increased resources. We note the pathways to implementation may be complex and require further research to develop our understanding of individual and organisational behaviours and motivation in LMIC settings.

trial registrationPROSPERO CRD42015016062.

Indexed as

Developing CountriesHealth Services AccessibilityMaternal Health ServicesPractice Guidelines as TopicAfrica South of the SaharaFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansPovertyPregnancyQualitative ResearchQuality ImprovementFramework synthesisGuideline implementationLow- and middle-income countriesObstetricsQualitative synthesisSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27770807
PMCPMC5075167
OpenAlexW2536383134

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.