Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27770624›Full record

ArticleHearing research2017

Spatial and temporal disparity in signals and maskers affects signal detection in non-human primates.

Francesca Rocchi, Margit E Dylla, Peter A Bohlen, Ramnarayan Ramachandran

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hearing research, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Spatial release from masking in crocodilians.Communications biology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Three psychophysical metrics of auditory temporal integration in macaques.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The use of nonhuman primates in studies of noise injury and treatment.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2019
    Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Francesca RocchiDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
Margit E DyllaDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
Peter A BohlenDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA.
Ramnarayan RamachandranDepartment of Hearing and Speech Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN 37212, USA. Electronic address: ramnarayan.ramachandran@vanderbilt.edu.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center · US

Funding

Research Project: Sensory and Multisensory Contributions to AutismU54HD083211 · NICHD · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI DYKENS, ELISABETH MAY · 2015 to 2019
$7.1M
Subcortical neural basis of hearing in noiseR01DC011092 · NIDCD · WAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI RAMACHANDRAN, RAMNARAYAN · 2010 to 2014
$1.8M
NICHD NIH HHS U54 HD083211NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC011092
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Detection thresholds for auditory stimuli (signals) increase in the presence of maskers. Natural environments contain maskers/distractors that can have a wide range of spatiotemporal properties relative to the signal. While these parameters have been well explored psychophysically in humans, they have not been well explored in animal models, and their neuronal underpinnings are not well understood. As a precursor to the neuronal measurements, we report the effects of systematically varying the spatial and temporal relationship between signals and noise in macaque monkeys (Macaca mulatta and Macaca radiata). Macaques detected tones masked by noise in a Go/No-Go task in which the spatiotemporal relationships between the tone and noise were systematically varied. Masked thresholds were higher when the masker was continuous or gated on and off simultaneously with the signal, and lower when the continuous masker was turned off during the signal. A burst of noise caused higher masked thresholds if it completely temporally overlapped with the signal, whereas partial overlap resulted in lower thresholds. Noise durations needed to be at least 100 ms before significant masking could be observed. Thresholds for short duration tones were significantly higher when the onsets of signal and masker coincided compared to when the signal was presented during the steady state portion of the noise (overshoot). When signal and masker were separated in space, masked signal detection thresholds decreased relative to when the masker and signal were co-located (spatial release from masking). Masking release was larger for azimuthal separations than for elevation separations. These results in macaques are similar to those observed in humans, suggesting that the specific spatiotemporal relationship between signal and masker determine threshold in natural environments for macaques in a manner similar to humans. These results form the basis for future investigations of neuronal correlates and mechanisms of masking.

Indexed as

Behavior, AnimalCuesPerceptual MaskingPitch PerceptionSignal Detection, PsychologicalSound LocalizationAcoustic StimulationAnimalsAudiometryAuditory PathwaysAuditory ThresholdMacaca mulattaMacaca radiataMaleModels, AnimalNoiseAuditory maskingAuditory scene analysisDetection thresholdSpatial release from maskingTemporal asynchrony

Identifiers

PMID27770624
PMCPMC5239734
OpenAlexW2536476065

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.