Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27770390›Full record

Observational studyInternational ophthalmology2017

Repeatability of ocular biometry with IOLMaster 700 in subjects with clear lens.

Manuel Garza-Leon, Hugo A Fuentes-de la Fuente, Ana V García-Treviño

Abstract readObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International ophthalmology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Keratometry repeatability in healthy and post-refractive surgery eyes: a comparison of two swept-source devices.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Mechanism of accommodation assessed by change in precisely registered ocular images associated with concurrent change in auto-refraction.Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie · 2018
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manuel Garza-LeonFundación Destellos de Luz IBP, Pino Suarez # 640, Consultorio 426, Colonia Centro, 64000, Monterrey, NL, Mexico. manuel@drgarza.mx.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9515-1992
Hugo A Fuentes-de la FuenteInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.
Ana V García-TreviñoInstituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Monterrey, NL, Mexico.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of the study was to assess the reproducibility of ocular biometry using the IOLMaster-700 in a healthy population.

methodsThis is a prospective, cross-sectional, observational reproducibility study. Ocular biometry was performed three times on each of 45 studied eyes. Flattest meridian (Kf) and the steepest meridian (Ks), central corneal thickness, axial length, anterior chamber depth, aqueous depth, lens thickness, and white-to-white distances were recorded. Reproducibility was evaluated using the coefficient of variation (CV), the within subject standard deviation, and the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

resultsThere was a high reproducibility in all parameters; CV was between 0.3 and 1 %, and the ICC was higher than 0.87 in all measurements.

conclusionsIOLMaster-700 showed high reproducibility for ocular biometry.

Indexed as

AdultAnterior ChamberAxial Length, EyeBiometryCorneal TopographyCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInterferometryMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesReference ValuesReproducibility of ResultsTomography, Optical CoherenceAxial lengthKeratometryOcular biometryReproducibilityWhite-to-white distance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.