Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27770252›Full record

Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2017

Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy-a randomized trial.

Cecilia Nilsson, Jette Led Sorensen, Lars Konge, Mikkel Westen, Morten Stadeager, Bent Ottesen, Flemming Bjerrum

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Pathophysiology for the Pediatric Critical Care Fellow: Three Representative Simulation Cases.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020
    Article
  18. Rating of camera navigation skills in colorectal surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Cecilia NilssonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Children, Women and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark. cecnilsson@gmail.com.ORCID 0000-0001-6877-502X
Jette Led SorensenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Children, Women and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lars KongeCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Mikkel WestenDepartment of Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Morten StadeagerDepartment of Surgery, Hvidovre Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Bent OttesenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Children, Women and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Flemming BjerrumDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Juliane Marie Centre for Children, Women and Reproduction, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, 2100, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKHvidovre Hospital · DKCopenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInexperienced operating assistants are often tasked with the important role of handling camera navigation during laparoscopic surgery. Incorrect handling can lead to poor visualization, increased operating time, and frustration for the operating surgeon-all of which can compromise patient safety. The objectives of this trial were to examine how to train laparoscopic camera navigation and to explore the transfer of skills to the operating room. MATERIALS AND

methodsA randomized, single-center superiority trial with three groups: The first group practiced simulation-based camera navigation tasks (camera group), the second group practiced performing a simulation-based cholecystectomy (procedure group), and the third group received no training (control group). Participants were surgical novices without prior laparoscopic experience. The primary outcome was assessment of camera navigation skills during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The secondary outcome was technical skills after training, using a previously developed model for testing camera navigational skills. The exploratory outcome measured participants' motivation toward the task as an operating assistant.

resultsThirty-six participants were randomized. No significant difference was found in the primary outcome between the three groups (p = 0.279). The secondary outcome showed no significant difference between the interventions groups, total time 167 s (95% CI, 118-217) and 194 s (95% CI, 152-236) for the camera group and the procedure group, respectively (p = 0.369). Both interventions groups were significantly faster than the control group, 307 s (95% CI, 202-412), p = 0.018 and p = 0.045, respectively. On the exploratory outcome, the control group for two dimensions, interest/enjoyment (p = 0.030) and perceived choice (p = 0.033), had a higher score.

conclusionsSimulation-based training improves the technical skills required for camera navigation, regardless of practicing camera navigation or the procedure itself. Transfer to the clinical setting could, however, not be demonstrated. The control group demonstrated higher interest/enjoyment and perceived choice than the camera group.

Indexed as

Simulation TrainingVirtual RealityAdultCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicFemaleHumansLaparoscopyStudents, MedicalYoung AdultCamera navigationLaparoscopic surgeryMotivationSimulatorSurgical educationVirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID27770252
PMCPMC5411407
OpenAlexW2534859530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.