Trial reportSurgical endoscopy2017
Simulation-based camera navigation training in laparoscopy-a randomized trial.
Trial report in Surgical endoscopy, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Three-dimensional vision versus two-dimensional vision on laparoscopic performance of trainee surgeons: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Updates in surgery · 2023Pooled it
- The impact of surgical simulation on patient outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2021Pooled it
- Effects of training in pairs versus training alone on reaching proficiency in minimally invasive Roux-en-Y-gastric bypass on a virtual reality trainer in medical students: a randomized-controlled trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Cognitive learning versus practical "hands-on" training for acquisition of laparoscopic surgical skills: an optimal combination study.Surgical endoscopy · 2025Trial
- Added value of 3D-vision during robotic pancreatoduodenectomy anastomoses in biotissue (LAEBOT 3D2D): a randomized controlled cross-over trial.Surgical endoscopy · 2021Trial
- Video-based analysis of camera-instrument distance dynamics and operative efficiency in expert and novice robot-assisted partial nephrectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Comparison of learning curve difference of laparoscopist according to controller type of flexible scope during laparoscopic liver resection.Surgical endoscopy · 2026Article
- Construct validation of a portable virtual reality simulator for [Formula: see text] laparoscopic camera navigation via machine learning and latent behavioral modeling.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- A head-mounted mixed reality platform for robotic flexible endoscope control in minimally invasive cholecystectomy: an animal feasibility study.Journal of robotic surgery · 2025Article
- Visual course of anatomical landmarks around the internal inguinal ring as a guide for horizon adjustment in laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair.Surgery today · 2025Article
- Bridging the gap: effects of simulation-based OB/GYN training on skills and self-perception in final-year medical students.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Simulation effect on medical sciences students' motivation: A systematic review study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Review
- Exploring the Role of Simulation Training in Improving Surgical Skills Among Residents: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2023Review
- Proctored preceptorship model for learning eTEP repair for inguinal hernia for general surgery residents.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2022Article
- Research Hotspots and Trend Exploration on the Clinical Translational Outcome of Simulation-Based Medical Education: A 10-Year Scientific Bibliometric Analysis From 2011 to 2021.Frontiers in medicine · 2021Article
- Pathophysiology for the Pediatric Critical Care Fellow: Three Representative Simulation Cases.MedEdPORTAL : the journal of teaching and learning resources · 2020Article
- Rating of camera navigation skills in colorectal surgery.International journal of colorectal disease · 2020Article
- Fluorescence cholangiography enhances surgical residents' biliary delineation skill for laparoscopic cholecystectomies.World journal of gastrointestinal surgery · 2020Article
- Transferability of Simulation-Based Training in Laparoscopic Surgeries: A Systematic Review.Minimally invasive surgery · 2020Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundInexperienced operating assistants are often tasked with the important role of handling camera navigation during laparoscopic surgery. Incorrect handling can lead to poor visualization, increased operating time, and frustration for the operating surgeon-all of which can compromise patient safety. The objectives of this trial were to examine how to train laparoscopic camera navigation and to explore the transfer of skills to the operating room. MATERIALS AND
methodsA randomized, single-center superiority trial with three groups: The first group practiced simulation-based camera navigation tasks (camera group), the second group practiced performing a simulation-based cholecystectomy (procedure group), and the third group received no training (control group). Participants were surgical novices without prior laparoscopic experience. The primary outcome was assessment of camera navigation skills during a laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The secondary outcome was technical skills after training, using a previously developed model for testing camera navigational skills. The exploratory outcome measured participants' motivation toward the task as an operating assistant.
resultsThirty-six participants were randomized. No significant difference was found in the primary outcome between the three groups (p = 0.279). The secondary outcome showed no significant difference between the interventions groups, total time 167 s (95% CI, 118-217) and 194 s (95% CI, 152-236) for the camera group and the procedure group, respectively (p = 0.369). Both interventions groups were significantly faster than the control group, 307 s (95% CI, 202-412), p = 0.018 and p = 0.045, respectively. On the exploratory outcome, the control group for two dimensions, interest/enjoyment (p = 0.030) and perceived choice (p = 0.033), had a higher score.
conclusionsSimulation-based training improves the technical skills required for camera navigation, regardless of practicing camera navigation or the procedure itself. Transfer to the clinical setting could, however, not be demonstrated. The control group demonstrated higher interest/enjoyment and perceived choice than the camera group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.