Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27770242›Full record

ArticleJournal of occupational rehabilitation2017

The Relation Between Catastrophizing and Occupational Disability in Individuals with Major Depression: Concurrent and Prospective Associations.

Heather Adams, Pascal Thibault, Tamra Ellis, Emily Moore, Michael Sullivan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of occupational rehabilitation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Validity of the Multidimensional Task Ability Profile.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2019
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Heather AdamsRecover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, Herston, QLD, Australia.
Pascal ThibaultDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Tamra EllisCentre for Rehabilitation and Health, Toronto, Canada.
Emily MooreDepartment of Psychology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada.
Michael SullivanFaculty of Health and Behavioural Sciences, Recover Injury Research Centre, The University of Queensland, 288 Herston Road, Level 7, Herston, QLD, 4006, Australia. Mick.Sullivan@uq.edu.au.
McGill University · CAUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

CIHR CRC-213763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background Catastrophic thinking has been associated with occupational disability in individuals with debilitating pain conditions. The relation between catastrophic thinking and occupational disability has not been previously examined in individuals with debilitating mental health conditions. The present study examined the relation between catastrophic thinking and occupational disability in individuals with major depression. Methods The study sample consisted of 80 work-disabled individuals with major depressive disorder (MDD) who were referred to an occupational rehabilitation service. Participants completed measures of depressive symptom severity, catastrophic thinking and occupational disability at admission and termination of a rehabilitation intervention. Return-to-work outcomes were assessed 1 month following the termination of the rehabilitation intervention. Results Cross-sectional analyses of admission data revealed that catastrophic thinking contributed significant variance to the prediction of self-reported occupational disability, beyond the variance accounted for by depressive symptom severity. Prospective analyses revealed that reductions in catastrophic thinking predicted successful return to work following the rehabilitation intervention, beyond the variance accounted for by reductions in depressive symptom severity. Conclusions The findings suggest that catastrophic thinking is a determinant of occupational disability in individuals with major depressive disorder. The findings further suggest that interventions designed to reduce catastrophic thinking might promote occupational re-integration in individuals with debilitating mental health conditions.

Indexed as

Severity of Illness IndexAdultCatastrophizationCross-Sectional StudiesDisability EvaluationFemaleHumansLogistic ModelsMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMiddle AgedPsychiatric Status Rating ScalesReturn to WorkSelf ReportCatastrophic thinkingDepressionDisabilityPain

Identifiers

PMID27770242
OpenAlexW2534471242

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.