Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27770014›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2017

The Central Apparatus of Cilia and Eukaryotic Flagella.

Thomas D Loreng, Elizabeth F Smith

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 84 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Exome sequencing-based identification ofFrontiers in molecular biosciences · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Concurrent loss of ciliary genesRoyal Society open science · 2023
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. TheInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cryo-EM structure of an active central apparatus.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas D LorengDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755.
Elizabeth F SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Dartmouth College, Hanover, New Hampshire 03755.
Dartmouth College · US

Funding

Molecular Mechanisms of Ciliary MotilityR01GM112050 · NIGMS · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI SMITH, ELIZABETH F · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM112050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The motile cilium is a complex organelle that is typically comprised of a 9+2 microtubule skeleton; nine doublet microtubules surrounding a pair of central singlet microtubules. Like the doublet microtubules, the central microtubules form a scaffold for the assembly of protein complexes forming an intricate network of interconnected projections. The central microtubules and associated structures are collectively referred to as the central apparatus (CA). Studies using a variety of experimental approaches and model organisms have led to the discovery of a number of highly conserved protein complexes, unprecedented high-resolution views of projection structure, and new insights into regulation of dynein-driven microtubule sliding. Here, we review recent progress in defining mechanisms for the assembly and function of the CA and include possible implications for the importance of the CA in human health.

Indexed as

AnimalsFlagellaHumans

Identifiers

PMID27770014
PMCPMC5287073
OpenAlexW2534480974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.