ArticleInteractive journal of medical research2016
Online Health Information Regarding Male Infertility: An Evaluation of Readability, Suitability, and Quality.
Article in Interactive journal of medical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed, 64 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of microsoft copilot artificial intelligence chatbot and google search in answering patient inquiries about infertility: evaluating readability, understandability, and actionability.International journal of impotence research · 2025Article
- Quality and readability of web-based information on dental caries in Arabic: an infodemiological study.BMC oral health · 2023Article
- The Simplified Chinese Version of the Suitability Assessment of Materials for the Evaluation of Health-Related Information for Adults: Translation and Validation Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- Translating and Adapting the DISCERN Instrument Into a Simplified Chinese Version and Validating Its Reliability: Development and Usability Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Online Health Information for Penile Prosthesis Implants Lacks Quality and Is Unreadable to the Average US Patient.Cureus · 2023Article
- Evaluation of a Mobile Health App Offering Fertility Information to Male Patients With Cancer: Usability Study.JMIR cancer · 2022Article
- Assessing the Quality of Online Health Information About Breast Cancer from Chinese Language Websites: Quality Assessment Survey.JMIR cancer · 2021Article
- An mHealth App to Support Fertility Patients Navigating the World of Infertility (Infotility): Development and Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Online Japanese-Language Information on Lifestyle Factors Associated With Reduced Fertility: Content Analysis.Journal of medical Internet research · 2020Article
- Evaluating the Quality of Health-Related WeChat Public Accounts: Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2020Article
- A review of the evolving landscape between the consumer Internet and men's health.Translational andrology and urology · 2020Review
- Multidimensional eHealth Literacy for Infertility.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Searching the Internet for Infertility Information: A Survey of Patient Needs and Preferences.Journal of medical Internet research · 2019Article
- It takes a community to conceive: an analysis of the scope, nature and accuracy of online sources of health information for couples trying to conceive.Reproductive biomedicine & society online · 2019Article
- Oncofertility Decision Support Resources for Women of Reproductive Age: Systematic Review.JMIR cancer · 2019Article
- Trustworthiness, Readability, and Suitability of Web-Based Information for Stroke Prevention and Self-Management for Korean Americans: Critical Evaluation.Interactive journal of medical research · 2018Article
- Identifying National Availability of Abortion Care and Distance From Major US Cities: Systematic Online Search.Journal of medical Internet research · 2018Article
- Evaluating the Dental Caries-Related Information on Brazilian Websites: Qualitative Study.Journal of medical Internet research · 2017Article
- Fertility Health Knowledge in U.S. Adults: Men Narrowing the Knowledge Gap.American journal of men's healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundMany men lack knowledge about male infertility, and this may have consequences for their reproductive and general health. Men may prefer to seek health information online, but these sources of information vary in quality.
objectiveThe objective of this study is to determine if online sources of information regarding male infertility are readable, suitable, and of appropriate quality for Internet users in the general population.
methodsThis study used a cross-sectional design to evaluate online sources resulting from search engine queries. The following categories of websites were considered: (1) Canadian fertility clinics, (2) North American organizations related to fertility, and (3) the first 20 results of Google searches using the terms "male infertility" and "male fertility preservation" set to the search locations worldwide, English Canada, and French Canada. Websites that met inclusion criteria (N=85) were assessed using readability indices, the Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM), and the DISCERN tool. The associations between website affiliation (government, university/medical, non-profit organization, commercial/corporate, private practice) and Google placement to readability, suitability, and quality were also examined.
resultsNone of the sampled websites met recommended levels of readability. Across all websites, the mean SAM score for suitability was 45.37% (SD 11.21), or "adequate", while the DISCERN mean score for quality was 43.19 (SD 10.46) or "fair". Websites that placed higher in Google obtained a higher overall score for quality with an r (58) value of -.328 and a P value of .012, but this position was not related to readability or suitability. In addition, 20% of fertility clinic websites did not include fertility information for men.
conclusionsThere is a lack of high quality online sources of information on male fertility. Many websites target their information to women, or fail to meet established readability criteria for the general population. Since men may prefer to seek health information online, it is important that health care professionals develop high quality sources of information on male fertility for the general population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.