ReviewTrends in cognitive sciences2016
Making Sense of Real-World Scenes.
Review in Trends in cognitive sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 63 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
63 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Emotional scene processing in children and adolescents with attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder: a systematic review.European child & adolescent psychiatry · 2021Pooled it
- Navigational affordances emerge stably with brief stimulus exposure despite changes in scene content.Journal of vision · 2026Article
- Post-saccadic disruption of semantic category information in naturalistic scenes.Cortex; a journal devoted to the study of the nervous system and behavior · 2026Article
- Training in the Categorization of Aerial and Terrestrial Scenes Differentially Impacts Scene-Selective and Nonscene-Selective Regions in Occipitotemporal Cortex.The European journal of neuroscience · 2026Article
- Linking retinal sampling in neural encoding models to temporal profiles of visual processing in humans.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Rethinking category-selectivity in human visual cortex.Cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Early spatiotemporal dynamics of navigational affordance coding in the dorsal visual cortex.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Generating metamers of human scene understanding.... International Conference on Learning Representations · 2026Article
- Post-Saccadic Disruption of Semantic Category Information in Naturalistic Scenes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Probing mental representations of space through sketch mapping: a scoping review.Cognitive research: principles and implications · 2025Article
- Maintaining visual stability in naturalistic scenes: The roles of trans-saccadic memory and default assumptions.Cognition · 2025Article
- Multidimensional Representation Dynamics for Abstract Visual Objects in Encoded Tangram Paradigms.Brain sciences · 2025Article
- Where do I go? Decoding temporal neural dynamics of scene processing and visuospatial memory interactions using convolutional neural networks.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- The role of scene context in object recognition: Timing and mechanisms.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- The role of anchor objects in scene function understanding.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Representation of locomotive action affordances in human behavior, brains, and deep neural networks.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025Article
- Cortical Encoding of Spatial Structure and Semantic Content in 3D Natural Scenes.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- What Is a Visual Stream?Journal of cognitive neuroscience · 2024Article
- Graspable foods and tools elicit similar responses in visual cortex.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2024Article
- Task-irrelevant semantic relationship between objects and scene influence attentional allocation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
3 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
To interact with the world, we have to make sense of the continuous sensory input conveying information about our environment. A recent surge of studies has investigated the processes enabling scene understanding, using increasingly complex stimuli and sophisticated analyses to highlight the visual features and brain regions involved. However, there are two major challenges to producing a comprehensive framework for scene understanding. First, scene perception is highly dynamic, subserving multiple behavioral goals. Second, a multitude of different visual properties co-occur across scenes and may be correlated or independent. We synthesize the recent literature and argue that for a complete view of scene understanding, it is necessary to account for both differing observer goals and the contribution of diverse scene properties.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.