Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27769242›Full record

ArticleBMC health services research2016

Maternal and child health voucher scheme in Myanmar: a review of early stage implementation.

Songyot Pilasant, Wantanee Kulpeng, Pitsaphun Werayingyong, Nattha Tritasavit, Inthira Yamabhai, Yot Teerawattananon, Sangay Wangmo, Sripen Tantivess

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Songyot PilasantHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Wantanee KulpengHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Pitsaphun WerayingyongHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand. pitsaphun.w@hitap.net.
Nattha TritasavitHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Inthira YamabhaiHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Yot TeerawattananonHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Sangay WangmoInternational Health Policy Program (IHPP), Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Sripen TantivessHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program (HITAP), Ministry of Public Health, Tiwanon Road, Muang, Nonthaburi, Thailand.
Ministry of Public Health · THHealth Intervention and Technology Assessment Program · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Maternal and Child Health Voucher Scheme (MCHVS) was introduced in Myanmar to address the high rate of maternal and infant mortalities. It aimed to increase access to maternal and child health (MCH) services by skilled birth attendants (SBAs) and improve the health of pregnant women and their babies. A study to pilot a voucher scheme was implemented in May 2013 in Yedarshey Township. This paper provides a report on a mid-term review of the programme after 7 months of implementation to determine the outcomes of the programme and its impediments.

methodsQuantitative and qualitative approaches were used. Secondary quantitative data were analysed in order to measure the coverage and utilisation of the programme. Semi-structured interviews were conducted in groups and individually with 79 key informants to explore qualitative information on voucher communication, beneficiary's identification, voucher distribution, and challenges for beneficiaries and providers under the MCHVS.

resultsThe results showed that 63 % of eligible pregnant women who registered to the programme received voucher booklets, while the utilisation of most of the MCH services increased over time; in particular, delivery by SBAs increased significantly (P < 0.01) after implementing MCHVS. Overall, the programme was implemented well in terms of promoting and communicating the programme to people in Yedarshey Township. Although a number of targeted poor pregnant women were included in the programme, some beneficiaries were overlooked for a variety of reasons. Nevertheless, both providers and beneficiaries who experienced the MCHVS service utilisation were satisfied with the programme. The evaluation indicated several programme challenges, i.e. external and internal programme communication, voluntary voucher distributor recruitment, incentive and support for voucher distributors, beneficiary screening criteria, and approaches to increase access of services for pregnant women living in remote areas.

conclusionsGenerally, the MCHVS pilot programme is a promising initiative to increase access to and utilisation of the MCH services for pregnant women and their babies in Myanmar. However, increasing coverage of the programme and overcoming the barriers should be considered as high-priority issues that need to be addressed.

Indexed as

ChildChild HealthFamilyFemaleHealth PromotionHealth Services AccessibilityHumansInfantInfant MortalityMaternal Health ServicesMyanmarPregnancyProgram EvaluationEvaluationMaternal and child health

Identifiers

PMID27769242
PMCPMC5073954
OpenAlexW2538346828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.