Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27769226›Full record

Trial reportBMC public health2016

The effectiveness of a Housing First adaptation for ethnic minority groups: findings of a pragmatic randomized controlled trial.

Vicky Stergiopoulos, Agnes Gozdzik, Vachan Misir, Anna Skosireva, Aseefa Sarang, Jo Connelly, Adam Whisler, Kwame McKenzie

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialPragmatic Clinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC public health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.1field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. A modeling study exploring the impact of homelessness on rostered primary care utilization in Calgary, Canada.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vicky StergiopoulosCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0003-3941-9434
Agnes GozdzikCentre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Vachan MisirCentre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Anna SkosirevaCentre for Urban Health Solutions, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Aseefa SarangAcross Boundaries, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jo ConnellyInner City Family Health Team, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Adam WhislerCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Kwame McKenzieCentre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada. Kwame.McKenzie@camh.ca.
St. Michael's Hospital · CACentre for Addiction and Mental Health · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the effectiveness of Housing First (HF) among ethnic minority groups, despite its growing popularity for homeless adults experiencing mental illness. This randomized controlled trial tests the effectiveness of a HF program using rent supplements and intensive case management, enhanced by anti-racism and anti-oppression practices for homeless adults with mental illness from diverse ethnic minority backgrounds.

methodsThis unblinded pragmatic field trial was carried out in community settings in Toronto, Canada. Participants were 237 adults from ethnic minority groups experiencing mental illness and homelessness, who met study criteria for moderate needs for mental health services. Participants were randomized to either adapted HF (n = 135) or usual care (n = 102) and followed every 3 months for 24 months. The primary study outcome was housing stability; secondary outcomes included physical and mental health, social functioning, quality of life, arrests and health service use. Intention to treat statistical analyses examined the effectiveness of the intervention compared to usual care.

resultsDuring the 24-month study period, HF participants were stably housed a significantly greater proportion of time compared to usual care participants, 75 % (95 % CI 70 to 81) vs. 41 % (95 % CI 35 to 48), respectively, for a difference of 34 %, 95 % CI 25 to 43. HF also led to improvements in community integration over the course of the study: the change in the mean difference between treatment groups from baseline to 24-months was significantly greater among HF participants compared to those in usual care (change in mean difference = 2.2, 95 % CI 0.06 to 4.3). Baseline diagnosis of psychosis was associated with reduced likelihood of being housed ≥ 50 % of the study period (OR = 0.37, 95 % CI 0.18 to 0.72).

conclusionHousing First enhanced with anti-racism and anti-oppression practices can improve housing stability and community functioning among ethnically diverse homeless adults with mental illness.

trial registrationInternational Standard Randomized Control Trial Number Register Identifier: ISRCTN42520374 , assigned August 18, 2009.

Indexed as

AdultCanadaCommunity IntegrationEthnicityFemaleHousingHumansIll-Housed PersonsMaleMental DisordersMental HealthMental Health ServicesMinority GroupsOutcome Assessment, Health CareQuality of LifeSocial ProblemsHomelessnessHousingMental illness ethnic minority

Identifiers

PMID27769226
PMCPMC5073863
OpenAlexW2537883501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.