Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27769207›Full record

Observational studyBMC pediatrics2016

Neonatal outcomes in pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation: a cohort study in Sweden.

Evangelia Elenis, Gunilla Sydsjö, Alkistis Skalkidou, Claudia Lampic, Agneta Skoog Svanberg

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in BMC pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Evangelia ElenisDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 83, Uppsala, Sweden. evangelia.elenis@kbh.uu.se.
Gunilla SydsjöObstetrics and Gynecology, Department of Clinical and Exprerimental Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden.
Alkistis SkalkidouDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 83, Uppsala, Sweden.
Claudia LampicDepartment of Neurobiology, Care sciences and Society, Karolinska Institutet, Solna, Sweden.
Agneta Skoog SvanbergDepartment of Women's and Children's Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala University Hospital, SE-751 83, Uppsala, Sweden.
Uppsala University Hospital · SEKarolinska Institutet · SELinköping University · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPregnancies resulting through oocyte donation have been associated with increased risk for adverse outcomes for the mother, such as gestational hypertensive disorders. However, little is known about possible neonatal complications of such pregnancies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the neonatal health outcomes among singleton pregnancies in a population of relatively young and healthy oocyte recipients in Sweden, taking into account the medical indication leading to treatment.

methodsThis cohort study involved 76 women conceiving with donated oocytes, 149 age-matched nulliparous women conceiving spontaneously and 63 women conceiving after non-donor IVF. Participants were recruited during 2005-2008 and followed up until delivery. Data on neonatal outcomes were retrieved from the National Birth Medical Register and the medical records of oocyte recipients from seven Swedish University Hospitals with IVF clinics. Logistic regression analyses were performed to examine the association of mode of conception and neonatal outcomes, adjusted for maternal age and BMI, gestational age and delivery by cesarean section.

resultsInfants conceived through oocyte donation had higher odds for premature delivery [OR 2.36, 95 % CI (1.02-5.45)], for being small for gestational age [OR 4.23, 95 % CI (1.03-17.42)] and having Apgar score below 7 at 5 min [OR 10.57, 95 % CI (1.21-92.20)] compared to spontaneously conceived infants. Similar trends were observed when comparing infants conceived through oocyte donation to those conceived by traditional IVF. Furthermore, donor oocyte infants had a lower mean birthweight and length compared to autologous oocyte neonates (p = 0.013); however no differences were noted among infants born at term. Neonatal outcomes were more favorable among women with diminished ovarian reserve compared to those with other indications for oocyte donation.

conclusionsInfants conceived after oocyte donation in Sweden have higher odds of being born prematurely and having lower mean birthweight in comparison to non-donor infants. It seems that these unfavorable neonatal outcomes are present despite the age, weight and health restrictions applied to recipients before oocyte donation treatment in Sweden.

Indexed as

Apgar ScoreInfant, PrematureInfant, Small for Gestational AgeAdultCase-Control StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansInfant, Low Birth WeightInfant, NewbornLogistic ModelsMaleOocyte DonationPregnancyPregnancy OutcomePremature BirthDonor conceptionIndication for oocyte donationIVFNeonatal morbidityNeonatal outcomesNewbornOocyte donation

Identifiers

PMID27769207
PMCPMC5073900
OpenAlexW2536689193

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.