Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27768764›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Combination of Cancer Stem Cell Markers CD44 and CD24 Is Superior to ALDH1 as a Prognostic Indicator in Breast Cancer Patients with Distant Metastases.

Yoshiya Horimoto, Atsushi Arakawa, Noriko Sasahara, Masahiko Tanabe, Sei Sai, Takanori Himuro, Mitsue Saito

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Immunohistochemistry for Cancer Stem Cell Detection: Principles and Methods.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Cockle Shell-Derived Aragonite CaCOInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yoshiya HorimotoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Atsushi ArakawaHuman Pathology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Noriko SasaharaHuman Pathology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Masahiko TanabeDepartment of Breast Surgery, Kyoundo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan.
Sei SaiMedical Physics Research Program, Research Center for Charged Particle Therapy, National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Chiba, Japan.
Takanori HimuroDepartment of Breast Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Mitsue SaitoDepartment of Breast Oncology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.
Juntendo University · JPOgikubo Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The combination of CD44 and CD24, or aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) alone, is a widely used cancer stem cell marker in breast cancer. However, no conclusion has yet been reached as to which marker is the best for characterizing cancer stemness. Immunohistochemical evaluation using cancer stem cell markers is clearly less common clinically than in basic experiments and how the expressions of these markers relate to patient outcomes remains controversial. To investigate whether combining these markers might improve the prediction of patient outcomes, we immunohistochemically examined clinical samples. Primary invasive breast cancer samples from 61 patients who eventually developed distant metastases after curative surgery were immunohistochemically examined. All patients were free of metastatic disease at the time of surgery and received standard adjuvant systemic treatments. CD44+/24- and ALDH1-positive rates in primary tumors differed according to intrinsic subtype. ER-positive patients with CD44+/24- tumors had significantly longer disease-free-survival than all other ER-positive patients (p = 0.0047). On the other hand, CD44+/24- tumors were associated with poor outcomes of ER-negative patients (p = 0.038). Finally, expression patterns of CD44 and ALDH1 in single tumors were strikingly different and there were virtually no individual double-stained cells. Thus, this combination does not allow evaluation of relationships with patient outcomes. Our results raise the possibility of CD44+/24- being a good prognostic marker, one which would allow treatment effects and outcomes to be predicted in patients with recurrent breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyBiomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsCD24 AntigenFemaleHumansHyaluronan ReceptorsImmunohistochemistryIsoenzymesMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisReceptors, EstrogenRetinal DehydrogenaseAldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 FamilyALDH1A1 protein, humanBiomarkers, TumorCD24 AntigenCD44 protein, humanHyaluronan ReceptorsIsoenzymesReceptors, EstrogenRetinal Dehydrogenase

Identifiers

PMID27768764
PMCPMC5074575
OpenAlexW2535352967

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.