Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27767330›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2016

Prospective comparison of MR with diffusion-weighted imaging, endoscopic ultrasound, MDCT and positron emission tomography-CT in the pre-operative staging of oesophageal cancer: results from a pilot study.

Francesco Giganti, Alessandro Ambrosi, Maria C Petrone, Carla Canevari, Damiano Chiari, Annalaura Salerno, Paolo G Arcidiacono, Roberto Nicoletti, Luca Albarello, Elena Mazza and 7 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed, 58 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. State-of-the-art imaging in oesophago-gastric cancer.The British journal of radiology · 2022
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. New frontiers in esophageal radiology.Annals of translational medicine · 2021
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Role of precision imaging in esophageal cancer.Journal of thoracic disease · 2020
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco Giganti1 Department of Radiology and Centre for Experimental Imaging, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5218-6431
Alessandro Ambrosi2 Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Maria C Petrone3 Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Carla Canevari4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Damiano Chiari2 Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Annalaura Salerno1 Department of Radiology and Centre for Experimental Imaging, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Paolo G Arcidiacono3 Pancreato-Biliary Endoscopy and Endosonography Division, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Roberto Nicoletti1 Department of Radiology and Centre for Experimental Imaging, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Luca Albarello6 Pathology Unit, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elena Mazza7 Department of Oncology, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesca Gallivanone8 Institute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology, National Research Council, IBFM-CNR, Milan, Italy.
Luigi Gianolli4 Department of Nuclear Medicine, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Elena Orsenigo5 Department of Surgery, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Vita-Salute University, Milan, Italy.
Antonio Esposito1 Department of Radiology and Centre for Experimental Imaging, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Carlo Staudacher2 Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
Alessandro Del Maschio1 Department of Radiology and Centre for Experimental Imaging, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Francesco De Cobelli1 Department of Radiology and Centre for Experimental Imaging, San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy.
Vita-Salute San Raffaele University · ITSan Raffaele University of Rome · ITInstitute of Molecular Bioimaging and Physiology · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance of MR and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), multidetector CT, endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and

methods18 patients with oesophageal or Siewert I tumour (9 directly treated with surgery and 9 addressed to chemo-/radiotherapy before) underwent 1.5-T MR and DWI, 64-channel multidetector CT, EUS and PET-CT before (n = 18) and also after neoadjuvant treatment (n = 9). All images were analysed and staged blindly by dedicated operators (seventh TNM edition). Two radiologists calculated independently the apparent diffusion coefficient from the first scan. Results were compared with histopathological findings. After the population had been divided according to local invasion (T1-T2 vs T3-T4) and nodal involvement (N0 vs N+), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive- and negative-predictive values were calculated and compared. Quantitative measurements from DWI and PET-CT were also analysed.

resultsFor T staging, EUS showed the best sensitivity (100%), whereas MR showed the highest specificity (92%) and accuracy (83%). For N staging, MR and EUS showed the highest sensitivity (100%), but none of the techniques showed adequate results for specificity. Overall, MR showed the highest accuracy (66%) for N stage, although this was not significantly different to the other modalities. The apparent diffusion coefficient was different between surgery-only and chemo-/radiotherapy groups (1.90 vs 1.30 × 10

conclusionIn this pilot study, we have shown that MR with DWI could enrich the current pre-operative work-up for oesophageal cancer and could be used for T and N staging. However, larger studies will need to be carried out before introducing this technique in the standard diagnostic pathway, in order to understand if MR with DWI could change its management and replace more costly or invasive tests such as PET-CT or EUS. Advances in knowledge: This pilot study represents the first effort where the four techniques have been prospectively compared together for oesophageal cancer staging. The combination of MR and DWI could provide important, additional information for staging and initial treatment decision-making.

Indexed as

AdultAgedDiffusion Magnetic Resonance ImagingEndosonographyEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagusFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultidetector Computed TomographyPilot ProjectsPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyPreoperative CareProspective StudiesReproducibility of Results

Identifiers

PMID27767330
PMCPMC5604902
OpenAlexW2539179078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.