Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766999›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2017

A systematic review of methods to assess intake of sugar-sweetened beverages among healthy European adults and children: a DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) study.

Fiona Riordan, Kathleen Ryan, Ivan J Perry, Matthias B Schulze, Lene Frost Andersen, Anouk Geelen, Pieter Van't Veer, Simone Eussen, Martien van Dongen, Nicole Wijckmans-Duysens and 1 more

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Determinants of diet and physical activity (DEDIPAC): a summary of findings.The international journal of behavioral nutrition and physical activity · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fiona Riordan1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health,University College Cork,Western Road,Cork,Republic of Ireland.
Kathleen Ryan2School of Applied Psychology,University College Cork,Cork,Republic of Ireland.
Ivan J Perry1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health,University College Cork,Western Road,Cork,Republic of Ireland.
Matthias B Schulze3Department of Molecular Epidemiology,German Institute of Human Nutrition,Potsdam-Rehbrücke,Germany.
Lene Frost Andersen4Department of Nutrition,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences,University of Oslo,Oslo,Norway.
Anouk Geelen5Division of Human Nutrition,Wageningen University,Wageningen,The Netherlands.
Pieter Van't Veer5Division of Human Nutrition,Wageningen University,Wageningen,The Netherlands.
Simone Eussen6Department of Epidemiology of the Faculty of Health,Medicine and Life Sciences,Maastricht University,Maastricht,The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5621-7944
Martien van Dongen6Department of Epidemiology of the Faculty of Health,Medicine and Life Sciences,Maastricht University,Maastricht,The Netherlands.
Nicole Wijckmans-Duysens6Department of Epidemiology of the Faculty of Health,Medicine and Life Sciences,Maastricht University,Maastricht,The Netherlands.
Janas M Harrington1Department of Epidemiology and Public Health,University College Cork,Western Road,Cork,Republic of Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveResearch indicates that intake of sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB) may be associated with negative health consequences. However, differences between assessment methods can affect the comparability of intake data across studies. The current review aimed to identify methods used to assess SSB intake among children and adults in pan-European studies and to inform the development of the DEDIPAC (DEterminants of DIet and Physical Activity) toolbox of methods suitable for use in future European studies.

designA literature search was conducted using three electronic databases and by hand-searching reference lists. English-language studies of any design which assessed SSB consumption were included in the review.

settingStudies involving two or more European countries were included in the review. SUBJECTS: Healthy, free-living children and adults.

resultsThe review identified twenty-three pan-European studies which assessed intake of SSB. The FFQ was the most commonly used (n 24), followed by the 24 h recall (n 6) and diet records (n 1). There were several differences between the identified FFQ, including the definition of SSB used. In total, seven instruments that were tested for validity were selected as potentially suitable to assess SSB intake among adults (n 1), adolescents (n 3) and children (n 3).

conclusionsThe current review highlights the need for instruments to use an agreed definition of SSB. Methods that were tested for validity and used in pan-European populations encompassing a range of countries were identified. These methods should be considered for use by future studies focused on evaluating consumption of SSB.

Indexed as

Diet RecordsSweetening AgentsAdultBeveragesChildDiet SurveysEuropeHumansSweetening AgentsDEDIPACDietary assessmentEuropeSugar-sweetened beverages

Identifiers

PMID27766999
PMCPMC10261338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.