Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766973›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2016

Factors associated with maternal near miss in childbirth and the postpartum period: findings from the birth in Brazil National Survey, 2011-2012.

Rosa Maria Soares Madeira Domingues, Marcos Augusto Bastos Dias, Arthur Orlando Corrêa Schilithz, Maria do Carmo Leal

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rosa Maria Soares Madeira DominguesInstituto Nacional de Infectologia Evandro Chagas/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Brasil, 4365 - Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21040-360, Brasil. rosa.domingues@ini.fiocruz.br.
Marcos Augusto Bastos DiasInstituto Nacional de Saúde da Mulher, da Criança e do Adolescente Fernandes Figueira/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Av. Rui Barbosa, 716 - Flamengo, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 22250-020, Brasil.
Arthur Orlando Corrêa SchilithzEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480 - Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21041-210, Brasil.
Maria do Carmo LealEscola Nacional de Saúde Pública Sérgio Arouca/Fundação Oswaldo Cruz, Rua Leopoldo Bulhões, 1480 - Manguinhos, Rio de Janeiro, CEP 21041-210, Brasil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMaternal near-miss (MNM) audits are considered a useful approach to improving maternal healthcare. The aim of this study was to evaluate the factors associated with maternal near-miss cases in childbirth and the postpartum period in Brazil.

methodsThe study is based on data from a nationwide hospital-based survey of 23,894 women conducted in 2011-2012. The data are from interviews with mothers during the postpartum period and from hospital medical files. Univariate and multivariable logistic regressions were performed to analyze factors associated with MNM, including estimation of crude and adjusted odds ratios and their respective 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI).

resultsThe estimated incidence of MNM was 10.2/1,000 live births (95 % CI: 7.5-13.7). In the adjusted analyses, MNM was associated with the absence of antenatal care (OR: 4.65; 95 % CI: 1.51-14.31), search for two or more services before admission to delivery care (OR: 4.49; 95 % CI: 2.12-9.52), obstetric complications (OR: 9.29; 95 % CI: 6.69-12.90), and type of birth: elective C-section (OR: 2.54; 95 % CI: 1.67-3.88) and forceps (OR: 9.37; 95 % CI: 4.01-21.91). Social and demographic maternal characteristics were not associated with MNM, although women who self-reported as white and women with higher schooling had better access to antenatal and maternity care services.

conclusionThe high proportion of elective C-sections performed among women in better social and economic situations in Brazil is likely attenuating the benefits that could be realized from improved prenatal care and greater access to maternity services. Strategies for reducing the rate of MNM in Brazil should focus on: 1) increasing access to prenatal care and delivery care, particularly among women who are at greater social and economic risk and 2) reducing the rate of elective cesarean section, particularly among women who receive services at private maternity facilities, where C-section rates reach 90 % of births.

Indexed as

ParturitionPostpartum PeriodAdolescentAdultBrazilChildFemaleHealth Care SurveysHumansIncidenceInfant, NewbornMaternal MortalityObstetric Labor ComplicationsPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID27766973
PMCPMC5073804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.