ArticleReproductive health2016
Labor and birth care by nurse with midwifery skills in Brazil.
Article in Reproductive health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.
- Prevalence of Episiotomy Practice and Associated Factors in Brazil: A Systematic Review.Birth (Berkeley, Calif.) · 2026Pooled it
- The prevalence of uterine fundal pressure during the second stage of labour for women giving birth in health facilities: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Reproductive health · 2021Pooled it
- Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017Pooled it
- Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Brazilian obstetricians in relation to childbirth care.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026Article
- Labor and birth care practices associated with exclusive breastfeeding at discharge.Revista brasileira de enfermagem · 2026Article
- Participation of obstetric nurses in the care of labor and delivery in private hospitals in Brazil: a cross-sectional observational study.Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992) · 2026Observational
- Social support network of Brazilian Amazonian women to subsidise the decision-making power of planned home birth: a qualitative study.BMJ open · 2024Article
- The effects of a quality improvement project to reduce caesarean sections in selected private hospitals in Brazil.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Staff Resources in Public and Private Hospitals and Their Implication for Medical Practice: A French Study of Caesareans.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Women's preference for a vaginal birth in Brazilian private hospitals: effects of a quality improvement project.Reproductive health · 2024Article
- Health professionals' perceptions of planned home birth care within the Brazilian health system.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2023Article
- Evaluation of labor and childbirth care by nurse-midwives in Brazilian private hospitals: results of a quality improvement project.Reproductive health · 2023Article
- Trend and Inequality in Episiotomy in Southern Brazil, 2007-2016: Evidence of Reduced Abusive Practice.Maternal and child health journal · 2022Article
- Article
- Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality improvement program to reduce caesarean sections in Brazilian private hospitals: a case study.Reproductive health · 2021Article
- Article
- Changes in perceived knowledge about childbirth among pregnant women participating in the Senses of Birth intervention in Brazil: a cross-sectional study.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2020Article
- Attention to childbirth and delivery in a university hospital: comparison of practices developed after Network Stork.Revista latino-americana de enfermagem · 2019Article
- Evaluation of a quality improvement intervention for labour and birth care in Brazilian private hospitals: a protocol.Reproductive health · 2018Article
- Born in Brazil: shining a light for change.Reproductive health · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe participation of nurses and midwives in vaginal birth care is limited in Brazil, and there are no national data regarding their involvement. The goal was to describe the participation of nurses and nurse-midwives in childbirth care in Brazil in the years 2011 and 2012, and to analyze the association between hospitals with nurses and nurse-midwives in labor and birth care and the use of good practices, and their influence in the reduction of unnecessary interventions, including cesarean sections.
methodsBirth in Brazil is a national, population-based study consisting of 23,894 postpartum women, carried out in the period between February 2011 and October 2012, in 266 healthcare settings. The study included all vaginal births involving physicians or nurses/nurse-midwives. A logistic regression model was used to examine the association between the implementation of good practices and suitable interventions during labor and birth, and whether care was a physician or a nurse/nurse-midwife led care. We developed another model to assess the association between the use of obstetric interventions during labor and birth to the personnel responsible for the care of the patient, comparing hospitals with decisions revolving exclusively around a physician to those that also included nurses/nurse-midwives as responsible for vaginal births.
results16.2 % of vaginal births were assisted by a nurse/nurse-midwife. Good practices were significantly more frequent in those births assisted by nurses/nurse-midwives (ad lib. diet, mobility during labor, non-pharmacological means of pain relief, and use of a partograph), while some interventions were less frequently used (anesthesia, lithotomy position, uterine fundal pressure and episiotomy). In maternity wards that included a nurse/nurse-midwife in labour and birth care, the incidence of cesarean section was lower.
conclusionsThe results of this study illustrate the potential benefit of collaborative work between physicians and nurses/nurse-midwives in labor and birth care. The adoption of good practices in managing labor and birth could be the first step toward more effective obstetric and midwifery care in Brazil. It may be easier to introduce new approaches rather than to eliminate old ones, which may explain why the reduction of unnecessary interventions during labor and birth was less pronounced than the adoption of new practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.