Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766971›Full record

ArticleReproductive health2016

Labor and birth care by nurse with midwifery skills in Brazil.

Silvana Granado Nogueira da Gama, Elaine Fernandes Viellas, Jacqueline Alves Torres, Maria Helena Bastos, Odaléa Maria Brüggemann, Mariza Miranda Theme Filha, Arthur Orlando Correa Schilithz, Maria do Carmo Leal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Reproductive health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Fundal pressure during the second stage of labour.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Knowledge, attitudes and practices of Brazilian obstetricians in relation to childbirth care.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Silvana Granado Nogueira da GamaNational School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. silvana.granado@gmail.com.
Elaine Fernandes ViellasNational School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Jacqueline Alves TorresNational Agency of Supplemental Health (ANS), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria Helena BastosNational School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Odaléa Maria BrüggemannFederal University of Santa Catarina (UFSC), Santa Catarina, Brazil.
Mariza Miranda Theme FilhaNational School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Arthur Orlando Correa SchilithzNational Cancer Institute (INCA), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Maria do Carmo LealNational School of Public Health, Oswaldo Cruz Foundation (ENSP/Fiocruz), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Fundação Oswaldo Cruz · BRInstituto Nacional do Câncer · BRUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe participation of nurses and midwives in vaginal birth care is limited in Brazil, and there are no national data regarding their involvement. The goal was to describe the participation of nurses and nurse-midwives in childbirth care in Brazil in the years 2011 and 2012, and to analyze the association between hospitals with nurses and nurse-midwives in labor and birth care and the use of good practices, and their influence in the reduction of unnecessary interventions, including cesarean sections.

methodsBirth in Brazil is a national, population-based study consisting of 23,894 postpartum women, carried out in the period between February 2011 and October 2012, in 266 healthcare settings. The study included all vaginal births involving physicians or nurses/nurse-midwives. A logistic regression model was used to examine the association between the implementation of good practices and suitable interventions during labor and birth, and whether care was a physician or a nurse/nurse-midwife led care. We developed another model to assess the association between the use of obstetric interventions during labor and birth to the personnel responsible for the care of the patient, comparing hospitals with decisions revolving exclusively around a physician to those that also included nurses/nurse-midwives as responsible for vaginal births.

results16.2 % of vaginal births were assisted by a nurse/nurse-midwife. Good practices were significantly more frequent in those births assisted by nurses/nurse-midwives (ad lib. diet, mobility during labor, non-pharmacological means of pain relief, and use of a partograph), while some interventions were less frequently used (anesthesia, lithotomy position, uterine fundal pressure and episiotomy). In maternity wards that included a nurse/nurse-midwife in labour and birth care, the incidence of cesarean section was lower.

conclusionsThe results of this study illustrate the potential benefit of collaborative work between physicians and nurses/nurse-midwives in labor and birth care. The adoption of good practices in managing labor and birth could be the first step toward more effective obstetric and midwifery care in Brazil. It may be easier to introduce new approaches rather than to eliminate old ones, which may explain why the reduction of unnecessary interventions during labor and birth was less pronounced than the adoption of new practices.

Indexed as

Labor, ObstetricAdolescentAdultBrazilChildFemaleHome ChildbirthHumansInfant, NewbornMaternal Health ServicesMidwiferyNurse MidwivesPractice Patterns, Nurses'PregnancyPrenatal CareYoung AdultGood practices in obstetricsMaternal and child healthNurse-midwife, Midwife, MidwiferyObstetric labourVaginal birth

Identifiers

PMID27766971
PMCPMC5073910
OpenAlexW2537383412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.