ArticleBMC genomics2016
More comprehensive forensic genetic marker analyses for accurate human remains identification using massively parallel DNA sequencing.
Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.
- Large-scale human genomic resources drive innovations toward forensic intelligent source attribution and precision identification.International journal of legal medicine · 2026Review
- Forensic DNA phenotyping: a review on SNP panels, genotyping techniques, and prediction models.Forensic sciences research · 2025Review
- Comparisons of aged samples and modern references provide algorithm for mtDNA analysis in challenging material.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Y-STR analysis of highly degraded DNA from skeletal remains over 70 years old.Forensic sciences research · 2024Article
- The forensic landscape and the population genetic analyses of Hainan Li based on massively parallel sequencing DNA profiling.International journal of legal medicine · 2021Article
- Alternatives to amelogenin markers for sex determination in humans and their forensic relevance.Molecular biology reports · 2020Review
- Mixture deconvolution by massively parallel sequencing of microhaplotypes.International journal of legal medicine · 2019Article
- Article
- DNA recovery and analysis from skeletal material in modern forensic contexts.Forensic sciences research · 2019Review
- Massively parallel sequencing techniques for forensics: A review.Electrophoresis · 2018Review
- Improved Y-STR typing for disaster victim identification, missing persons investigations, and historical human skeletal remains.International journal of legal medicine · 2018Article
- Investigation of the STR loci noise distributions of PowerSeq™ Auto System.Croatian medical journal · 2017Article
- Erratum to: More Comprehensive Forensic Genetic Marker Analyses for Accurate Human Remains Identification Using Massively Parallel DNA Sequencing.BMC genomics · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough the primary objective of forensic DNA analyses of unidentified human remains is positive identification, cases involving historical or archaeological skeletal remains often lack reference samples for comparison. Massively parallel sequencing (MPS) offers an opportunity to provide biometric data in such cases, and these cases provide valuable data on the feasibility of applying MPS for characterization of modern forensic casework samples. In this study, MPS was used to characterize 140-year-old human skeletal remains discovered at a historical site in Deadwood, South Dakota, United States. The remains were in an unmarked grave and there were no records or other metadata available regarding the identity of the individual. Due to the high throughput of MPS, a variety of biometric markers could be typed using a single sample.
resultsUsing MPS and suitable forensic genetic markers, more relevant information could be obtained from a limited quantity and quality sample. Results were obtained for 25/26 Y-STRs, 34/34 Y SNPs, 166/166 ancestry-informative SNPs, 24/24 phenotype-informative SNPs, 102/102 human identity SNPs, 27/29 autosomal STRs (plus amelogenin), and 4/8 X-STRs (as well as ten regions of mtDNA). The Y-chromosome (Y-STR, Y-SNP) and mtDNA profiles of the unidentified skeletal remains are consistent with the R1b and H1 haplogroups, respectively. Both of these haplogroups are the most common haplogroups in Western Europe. Ancestry-informative SNP analysis also supported European ancestry. The genetic results are consistent with anthropological findings that the remains belong to a male of European ancestry (Caucasian). Phenotype-informative SNP data provided strong support that the individual had light red hair and brown eyes.
conclusionsThis study is among the first to genetically characterize historical human remains with forensic genetic marker kits specifically designed for MPS. The outcome demonstrates that substantially more genetic information can be obtained from the same initial quantities of DNA as that of current CE-based analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.