Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766955›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2016

e-GRASP: an integrated evolutionary and GRASP resource for exploring disease associations.

Sajjad Karim, Hend Fakhri NourEldin, Heba Abusamra, Nada Salem, Elham Alhathli, Joel Dudley, Max Sanderford, Laura B Scheinfeldt, Adeel G Chaudhary, Mohammed H Al-Qahtani and 1 more

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Maternal 5Frontiers in genetics · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Sajjad KarimCenter for Excellence in Genome Medicine and Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Hend Fakhri NourEldinCenter for Excellence in Genome Medicine and Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Heba AbusamraCenter for Excellence in Genome Medicine and Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Nada SalemCenter for Excellence in Genome Medicine and Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Elham AlhathliCenter for Excellence in Genome Medicine and Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
Joel DudleyDepartment of Genetics and Genomic Sciences, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY, 10029, USA.
Max SanderfordInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Laura B ScheinfeldtInstitute for Genomics and Evolutionary Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, 19122, USA.
Adeel G Chaudhary
Mohammed H Al-Qahtani
Sudhir KumarCenter for Excellence in Genome Medicine and Research, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia. s.kumar@temple.edu.

Funding

COMPARATIVE MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANALYSISR01HG002096 · NHGRI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI KUMAR, SUDHIR · 2000 to 2013
$3.0M
Methods for Evolutionary Informed Network Analysis to Discover Disease VariationR01DK098242 · NIDDK · ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI · PI DUDLEY, JOEL THOMAS · 2013 to 2016
$1.7M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG002096NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK098242
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGenome-wide association studies (GWAS) have become a mainstay of biological research concerned with discovering genetic variation linked to phenotypic traits and diseases. Both discrete and continuous traits can be analyzed in GWAS to discover associations between single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and traits of interest. Associations are typically determined by estimating the significance of the statistical relationship between genetic loci and the given trait. However, the prioritization of bona fide, reproducible genetic associations from GWAS results remains a central challenge in identifying genomic loci underlying common complex diseases. Evolutionary-aware meta-analysis of the growing GWAS literature is one way to address this challenge and to advance from association to causation in the discovery of genotype-phenotype relationships. DESCRIPTION: We have created an evolutionary GWAS resource to enable in-depth query and exploration of published GWAS results. This resource uses the publically available GWAS results annotated in the GRASP2 database. The GRASP2 database includes results from 2082 studies, 177 broad phenotype categories, and ~8.87 million SNP-phenotype associations. For each SNP in e-GRASP, we present information from the GRASP2 database for convenience as well as evolutionary information (e.g., rate and timespan). Users can, therefore, identify not only SNPs with highly significant phenotype-association P-values, but also SNPs that are highly replicated and/or occur at evolutionarily conserved sites that are likely to be functionally important. Additionally, we provide an evolutionary-adjusted SNP association ranking (E-rank) that uses cross-species evolutionary conservation scores and population allele frequencies to transform P-values in an effort to enhance the discovery of SNPs with a greater probability of biologically meaningful disease associations.

conclusionBy adding an evolutionary dimension to the GWAS results available in the GRASP2 database, our e-GRASP resource will enable a more effective exploration of SNPs not only by the statistical significance of trait associations, but also by the number of studies in which associations have been replicated, and the evolutionary context of the associated mutations. Therefore, e-GRASP will be a valuable resource for aiding researchers in the identification of bona fide, reproducible genetic associations from GWAS results. This resource is freely available at http://www.mypeg.info/egrasp .

Indexed as

Databases, GeneticEvolution, MolecularDiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyGenomicsHumansPolymorphism, Single NucleotideUser-Computer InterfaceConservationDiseaseGRASPGWASPhenotypePolymorphismSNP

Identifiers

PMID27766955
PMCPMC5073857

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.