Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766549›Full record

ArticleJournal of endocrinological investigation2017

Daily life reflections of acromegaly guidelines.

T Apaydin, H M Ozkaya, F E Keskin, O A Haliloglu, K Karababa, S Erdem, P Kadioglu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of endocrinological investigation, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

T ApaydinDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cerrahpasa Medical School, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
H M OzkayaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cerrahpasa Medical School, University of Istanbul, 34303, Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
F E KeskinDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cerrahpasa Medical School, University of Istanbul, 34303, Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
O A HalilogluDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cerrahpasa Medical School, University of Istanbul, 34303, Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
K KarababaDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cerrahpasa Medical School, University of Istanbul, 34303, Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey.
S ErdemPituitary Center, University of Istanbul, Istanbul, Turkey.
P KadiogluDepartment of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Cerrahpasa Medical School, University of Istanbul, 34303, Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey. kadioglup@yahoo.com.
Istanbul University-Cerrahpaşa · TRIstanbul University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo determine the differences in acromegaly diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up among Turkish endocrinologists, and to investigate how the published guidelines are applied in clinical practice.

methodsThe questionnaire was formatted as an electronic survey, conducted between November and December 2015, and sent weekly for 6 weeks via e-mail to 528 endocrinologists in Turkey.

resultsThe questionnaire was answered by 37.4 % of endocrinologists. Insulin-like growth factor-1 and nadir growth hormone level after 75 g oral glucose tolerance test (nadir GH-OGTT) were the most commonly preferred methods for the initial diagnosis. A total of 49.5 % of the participants reported using preoperative medical therapy (MT) either routinely or on a case-to-case basis. Somatostatin analogs were the most commonly used drugs, both in pre- and postoperative MT. Disease activity following surgery was assessed in the 3rd postoperative month using IGF-1 levels. Similarly, IGF-1 monitoring was preferred in the follow-up period. Monitoring nadir GH-OGTT levels was the most commonly used method in the assessment of discordant test results. The dose titration was done at month 3 after the start of MT. Resistance to SRLs was considered after using the maximal dose for at least 6 months. Pegvisomant was generally used in second- and third-line therapy. Similarly, cabergoline was not preferred in monotherapy by the majority of participants. Radiotherapy was considered in patients with incomplete response to surgery and medical treatments.

conclusionsAlthough there were subtle differences, clinical practice guidelines were usually followed among Turkish endocrinologists.

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingEndocrinologyAcromegalyHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPractice Patterns, Physicians'AcromegalyDaily life practiceGrowth hormoneInsulin-like growth factor 1Questionnaire

Identifiers

PMID27766549
OpenAlexW2536084960

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.