Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766423›Full record

ArticleClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2017

The assessment of ischaemic burden: validation of a functional jeopardy score against cardiovascular magnetic resonance perfusion imaging.

Shazia T Hussain, Geraint Morton, Kalpa De Silva, Roy Jogiya, Andreas Schuster, Matthias Paul, Divaka Perera, Eike Nagel

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Aborted sudden cardiac death: ICD or no ICD.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Article
  4. Role of exercise cardiogoniometry in coronary artery disease diagnostics.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shazia T HussainCardiology Department, Papworth Hospital NHS trust, Papworth Everard, Cambridgeshire, UK. shaziathussain@icloud.com.
Geraint MortonPortsmouth Hospitals NHS Trust, Portsmouth, UK.
Kalpa De SilvaCardiovascular Division, King's College London BHF Centre of Excellence, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, The Rayne Institute, London, UK.
Roy JogiyaDivision of Imaging Sciences, King's College London BHF Centre of Excellence, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre and Welcome Trust and EPSRC Medical Engineering Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, The Rayne Institute, London, UK.
Andreas SchusterDepartment of Cardiology and Pneumonology, Georg-August-University Gottingen and German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK, Partner Site Gottingen), Gottingen, Germany.
Matthias PaulLuzerner Kantonsspital, 6000, Luzern 16, Switzerland.
Divaka PereraCardiovascular Division, King's College London BHF Centre of Excellence, NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, The Rayne Institute, London, UK.
Eike NagelDZHK Centre for Cardiovascular Imaging, University Hospital, Frankfurt/Main, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study assesses the relationship between classical anatomical jeopardy scores, functional jeopardy scores (combined anatomical and haemodynamic data), and the extent of ischaemia identified on cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) perfusion imaging. METHODS AND

resultsIn 42 patients with stable angina and suspected coronary artery disease (CAD), CMR perfusion imaging was performed. Fractional Flow Reserve (FFR) was measured in vessels with ≥50 % stenosis. The APPROACH and BCIS jeopardy scores were calculated based on QCA results with both a 70 % (APP

conclusionsAnatomical and functional jeopardy scores overestimate ischaemic burden when compared to CMR. Integrating physiological information from FFR to generate a functional score improves ischaemic burden estimation.

Indexed as

Coronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary CirculationFemaleFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMagnetic Resonance Imaging, CineMaleMiddle AgedMyocardial Perfusion ImagingProspective StudiesROC CurveSeverity of Illness IndexCoronary artery diseaseFractional flow reserveIschemiaNon-invasive imagingQCA

Identifiers

PMID27766423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.