Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766404›Full record

ReviewSchmerz (Berlin, Germany)2017

[Dipyrone (metamizole) : Considerations on monitoring for early detection of agranulocytosis].

U M Stamer, U Gundert-Remy, E Biermann, J Erlenwein, W Meiβner, S Wirz, T Stammschulte

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Schmerz (Berlin, Germany), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
6.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Guideline
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Regional Differences in Prescribing Patterns of Metamizole in Germany Based on Data from 70 Million Persons.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  13. [Treatment of pain in people with dementia].Zeitschrift fur Gerontologie und Geriatrie · 2019
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. [Pharmacology of non-opioid analgesics].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2019
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

U M StamerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie, Inselspital und Departement für Klinische Forschung, Universität Bern, Freiburgstr., 3010, Bern, Schweiz. ulrike.stamer@dkf.unibe.ch.
U Gundert-RemyArzneimittelkommission der Deutschen Ärzteschaft, Berlin, Deutschland.
E BiermannRechtsabteilung, Berufsverband Deutscher Anästhesisten, Nürnberg, Deutschland.
J ErlenweinKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsmedizin Göttingen, Göttingen, Deutschland.
W MeiβnerKlinik für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Jena, Deutschland.
S WirzAbteilung für Anästhesie, Intensivmedizin, Schmerzmedizin/Palliativmedizin, CURA - katholisches Krankenhaus im Siebengebirge, Bad Honnef, Deutschland.
T StammschulteArzneimittelkommission der Deutschen Ärzteschaft, Berlin, Deutschland.
Arzneimittelkommission der deutschen ÄrzteschaftDeutsche Gesellschaft für Anästhesiologie und Intensivmedizin · DEJena University Hospital · DEUniversitätsmedizin Göttingen · DEUniversity of Bern · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDipyrone (metamizole) is a non-opioid analgesic commonly used in Germany, which can, in very rare cases, cause life-threatening agranulocytosis. The prescribing information calls for regular monitoring of the differential blood count in cases of long-term treatment. However, there is uncertainty about how this testing should be handled in practice.

objectivesWhich recommendations can be derived from the published literature for evaluating blood cell counts during treatment with metamizole and which other options for monitoring exist?

methodsData from recent epidemiological studies, reviews, and spontaneously reported cases were evaluated.

resultsAgranulocytosis can emerge at highly variable intervals ranging from the first day of metamizole treatment to months after treatment has begun. As a result, there is no conclusive, evidence-based recommendation for the time intervals at which blood cell counts should be tested. Therefore, the onset of clinical symptoms should be used as trigger for monitoring blood cell counts to enable early diagnosis and avoid agranulocytosis-related complications. In addition to general symptoms like fever, sore throat, fatigue, and muscle pain, mucosal ulcerations, severe angina, and systemic infections leading to sepsis are typical of agranulocytosis.

conclusionsProviding patients and medical staff with better information about early symptoms of agranulocytosis could be a sensible way to prevent complications. Any suspicion of agranulocytosis should immediately lead to a differential blood count and to the withdrawal of all drugs possibly associated with agranulocytosis. Patients should be monitored and treated according to the severity of their symptoms.

Indexed as

Drug MonitoringAgranulocytosisAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBlood Cell CountDipyroneEarly DiagnosisHumansLong-Term CareAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalDipyroneAgranulocytosisDiagnosisDifferential blood countDipyroneSymptoms

Identifiers

PMID27766404
OpenAlexW2624745729

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.