Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766377›Full record

ReviewMedizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin2018

[Diaphragm dysfunction : Facts for clinicians].

C S Bruells, G Marx

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Medizinische Klinik, Intensivmedizin und Notfallmedizin, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

C S BruellsKlinik für Operative Intensivmedizin und Intermediate Care, Universitätsklinik der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland. cbruells@ukaachen.de.
G MarxKlinik für Operative Intensivmedizin und Intermediate Care, Universitätsklinik der RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstraße 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum Aachen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diaphragm function is crucial for patient outcome in the ICU setting and during the treatment period. The occurrence of an insufficiency of the respiratory pump, which is predominantly formed by the diaphragm, may result in intubation after failure of noninvasive ventilation. Especially patients suffering from chronic obstructive pulmonary disease are in danger of hypercapnic respiratory failure. Changes in biomechanical properties and fiber texture of the diaphragm are further cofactors directly leading to a need for intubation and mechanical ventilation. After intubation and the following inactivity the diaphragm is subject to profound pathophysiologic changes resulting in atrophy and dysfunction. Besides this inactivity-triggered mechanism (termed as ventilator-induced diaphragmatic dysfunction) multiple factors, comorbidities, pharmaceutical agents and additional hits during the ICU treatment, especially the occurrence of sepsis, influence diaphragm homeostasis and can lead to weaning failure. During the weaning process monitoring of diaphragm function can be done with invasive methods - ultrasound is increasingly established to monitor diaphragm contraction, but further and better powered studies are in need to prove its value as a diagnostic tool.

Indexed as

DiaphragmNoninvasive VentilationPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveRespiratory InsufficiencyHumansRespiration, ArtificialVentilator WeaningChronic obstructive pulmonary diseaseICU-acquired diaphragmatic weaknessVentilator-induced diaphragm dysfunctionWeaning failureWeaning from mechanical ventilation

Identifiers

PMID27766377
OpenAlexW2767346173

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.