ArticleAnalytical and bioanalytical chemistry2017
Design and microfabrication of a miniature fiber optic probe with integrated lenses and mirrors for Raman and fluorescence measurements.
Article in Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- On-Chip Photonic Detection Techniques for Non-Invasive In Situ Characterizations at the Microfluidic Scale.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Unpacking the packaged optical fiber bio-sensors: understanding the obstacle for biomedical application.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2024Review
- Low-cost and open-source strategies for chemical separations.Journal of chromatography. A · 2021Review
- Optofluidic detection setup for multi-parametric analysis of microbiological samples in droplets.Biomicrofluidics · 2020Article
- 3D printed microfluidic device for online detection of neurochemical changes with high temporal resolution in human brain microdialysate.Lab on a chip · 2019Article
- Dynamic Measurement of Nanoflows: Analysis and Theory of an Optofluidic Flowmeter.Physical review applied · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Fiber optics coupled to components such as lenses and mirrors have seen extensive use as probes for Raman and fluorescence measurements. Probes can be placed directly on or into a sample to allow for simplified and remote application of these optical techniques. The size and complexity of such probes however limits their application. We have used microfabrication in polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) to create compact probes that are 0.5 mm thick by 1 mm wide. The miniature probes incorporate pre-aligned mirrors, lenses, and two fiber optic guides to allow separate input and output optical paths suitable for Raman and fluorescence spectroscopy measurements. The fabricated probe has 70 % unidirectional optical throughput and generates no spectral artifacts in the wavelength range of 200 to 800 nm. The probe is demonstrated for measurement of fluorescence within microfluidic devices and collection of Raman spectra from a pharmaceutical tablet. The fluorescence limit of detection was 6 nM when using the probe to measure resorufin inside a 150-μm inner diameter glass capillary, 100 nM for resorufin in a 60-μm-deep × 100-μm-wide PDMS channel, and 11 nM for fluorescein in a 25-μm-deep × 80-μm-wide glass channel. It is demonstrated that the same probe can be used on different sample types, e.g., microfluidic chips and tablets. Compared to existing Raman and fluorescence probes, the microfabricated probes enable measurement in smaller spaces and have lower fabrication cost. Graphical abstract A microfabricated spectroscopic probe with integrated optics was developed for chemical detection in small spaces and in remote applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.