Trial reportDiabetologia2017
ACCORDION MIND: results of the observational extension of the ACCORD MIND randomised trial.
Trial report in Diabetologia, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00182910, which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Who cites it
60 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 114 citations in OpenAlex.
- Intensive Blood Pressure Treatment Goals: Evidence for Cardiovascular Protection From Observational Studies and Clinical Trials.American journal of hypertension · 2022Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Pharmacological treatment of hypertension in people without prior cerebrovascular disease for the prevention of cognitive impairment and dementia.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Diabetes-Specific Dementia: A Structured Literature Review of Cognitive Assessment Methods.The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle SurgeonsPooled it
- Renal function as an effect modifier of intensive glucose control in delaying cognitive function decline among individuals with type 2 diabetes: A revisit to the ACCORD MIND trial.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2024Trial
- Association of Type 2 Diabetes Subgroups With Cognitive Status Without Modification From Lifestyle Intervention.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2023Trial
- Plasma amyloid beta, neurofilament light chain, and total tau in the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT).Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2022Trial
- Development and validation of the dialysis dementia risk score: A retrospective, population-based, nested case-control study.European journal of neurology · 2022Trial
- Trial
- Association of Intensive vs Standard Blood Pressure Control With Cerebral White Matter Lesions.JAMA · 2019Trial
- Does left ventricular hypertrophy affect cognition and brain structural integrity in type 2 diabetes? Study design and rationale of the Diabetes and Dementia (D2) study.BMC endocrine disorders · 2017Trial
- Intensive versus standard blood pressure control and overall brain small vessel disease burden: a post-hoc analysis of the SPRINT randomized clinical trial.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Improving cognition through lifestyle-induced remission of type 2 diabetes: findings from DIABEPIC-2.Acta diabetologica · 2026Article
- Cognitive reserve against vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia: A scoping review.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Accelerated epigenetic aging as a modifier of homocysteine-associated cognitive decline: Findings from NHANES.Alzheimer's & dementia : the journal of the Alzheimer's Association · 2026Article
- Article
- The enigma of vascular dementia: current state and emerging perspectives.Journal of neural transmission (Vienna, Austria : 1996) · 2026Review
- Article
- Lipoprotein levels and statin treatment related to dementia and cognitive decline in individuals with type 2 diabetes: an observational analysis from the ADVANCE study.Cardiovascular diabetology · 2025 · on this mapObservational
- Cognitive dysfunction in diabetes - the 'forgotten' diabetes complication: a narrative review.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
Abstract
aims/hypothesisThe Memory in Diabetes (MIND) substudy of the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) study, a double 2x2 factorial parallel-group randomised clinical trial, tested whether intensive compared with standard management of hyperglycaemia, BP or lipid levels reduced cognitive decline and brain atrophy in 2977 people with type 2 diabetes. We describe the results of the observational extension study, ACCORDION MIND (ClinicalTrials.gov registration no. NCT00182910), which aimed to measure the long-term effects of the three ACCORD interventions on cognitive and brain structure outcomes approximately 4 years after the trial ended.
methodsParticipants (mean diabetes duration 10 years; mean age 62 years at baseline) received a fourth cognitive assessment and a third brain MRI, targeted at 80 months post-randomisation. Primary outcomes were performance on the Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST) and total brain volume (TBV). The contrast of primary interest compared glycaemic intervention groups at the ACCORDION visit; secondary contrasts were the BP and lipid interventions.
resultsOf the surviving ACCORD participants eligible for ACCORDION MIND, 1328 (68%) were re-examined at the ACCORDION follow-up visit, approximately 47 months after the intensive glycaemia intervention was stopped. The significant differences in therapeutic targets for each of the three interventions (glycaemic, BP and lipid) were not sustained. We found no significant difference in 80 month mean change from baseline in DSST scores or in TBV between the glycaemic intervention groups, or the BP and lipid interventions. Sensitivity analyses of the sites with ≥70% participation at 80 months revealed consistent results. CONCLUSIONS/
interpretationThe ACCORD interventions did not result in long-term beneficial or adverse effects on cognitive or brain MRI outcomes at approximately 80 months follow-up. Loss of separation in therapeutic targets between treatment arms and loss to follow-up may have contributed to the lack of detectable long-term effects.
trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT00182910.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.