ArticleBioMed research international2016
Retrograde versus Antegrade Approach for the Management of Large Proximal Ureteral Stones.
Article in BioMed research international, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 15 citations in OpenAlex.
- Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of antegrade ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus retrograde ureteroscopic lithotripsy in the treatment of upper ureteric stones measuring > 10 mm in maximum dimension and/or impacted stones: randomized comparative study.World journal of urology · 2026Trial
- Article
- DIFFERENT APPROACHES TO MANAGING UROLITHIASIS IN KIDNEY TRANSPLANT PATIENTS - A CASE REPORT.Acta clinica Croatica · 2023Article
- Endourology treatment of giant ureteral stone: Distal ureteral stone lithotripsy with nephroscope and shockpulse.Urology case reports · 2022Article
- Canadian Urological Association guideline: Management of ureteral calculi - Full-text.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2021Article
- Comparison of antegrade and retrograde ureterolithotripsy for proximal ureteral stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Translational andrology and urology · 2021Article
- 'Boxing in the corner': A modified retrograde approach for the management of proximal ureteric stones of 1-2 cm.Arab journal of urology · 2021Article
- Editorial Comment to Successful percutaneous flexible ureteroscopy for treatment of distal ureteral stones under modified Valdivia position after Cohen reimplantation.IJU case reports · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.