Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766166›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of microbiology & immunology2016

Role of suPAR and Lactic Acid in Diagnosing Sepsis and Predicting Mortality in Elderly Patients.

Walaa S Khater, Noha N Salah-Eldeen, Mohamed S Khater, Asghraf N Saleh

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of microbiology & immunology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Cytokine Storm-Definition, Causes, and Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. An Update on Sepsis Biomarkers.Infection & chemotherapy · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Preseptic Period and Inflammatory Markers in the Prediction of the Course of Sepsis.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Walaa S KhaterMedical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University , Cairo, Egypt.
Noha N Salah-EldeenMedical Microbiology and Immunology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University , Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed S KhaterGeriatrics and Gerontology Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University , Cairo, Egypt.
Asghraf N SalehAnesthesia and Intensive Care Department, Faculty of Medicine, Ain Shams University , Cairo, Egypt.
Ain Shams University · EG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study investigated the diagnostic value of soluble urokinase plasminogen activator receptor (suPAR) and serum lactate in elderly patients with sepsis and evaluated their capacity to predict mortality and their correlation to Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. The study included 80 participants, divided into two groups: 40 cases (mean age, 68.9 ± 5.9) admitted to the intensive care unit and 40 healthy controls (mean age, 67.1 ± 6.2). Elderly patients with sepsis had significantly higher levels of serum suPAR and lactic acid compared to healthy controls. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that suPAR (cutoff value, ≥4.37 ng/ml) has higher area under the curve (AUC) than lactic acid (cutoff value, ≥1.95 mmol/l) for diagnosing sepsis. Serum lactate has superior prognostic value compared to suPAR with AUC of 0.82 (cutoff value, 2.2 mmol/l) and 0.72 (cutoff value, 6.3 ng/ml), respectively. The diagnostic power of combined usage of suPAR and lactate serum concentrations showed AUC of 0.988 (95% confidence interval 0.934 to 1.0). The combination of both biomarkers either together or with SOFA score may serve as a useful guide to patients who need more intensive resuscitation.

Indexed as

bacterialbiomarkersdiagnosisgeriatricsprognosissepsis

Identifiers

PMID27766166
PMCPMC5063010
OpenAlexW2484458077

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.