Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766152›Full record

ReviewConservation physiology2016

Understanding invasion history and predicting invasive niches using genetic sequencing technology in Australia: case studies from Cucurbitaceae and Boraginaceae.

Razia S Shaik, Xiaocheng Zhu, David R Clements, Leslie A Weston

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Conservation physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Razia S ShaikGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries) , Locked Bag 588 , Wagga Wagga , NSW 2678 , Australia.
Xiaocheng ZhuGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries) , Locked Bag 588 , Wagga Wagga , NSW 2678 , Australia.
David R ClementsDepartment of Biology , Trinity Western University , Langley , BC , Canada V2Y 1Y1.
Leslie A WestonGraham Centre for Agricultural Innovation (Charles Sturt University and NSW Department of Primary Industries) , Locked Bag 588 , Wagga Wagga , NSW 2678 , Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Part of the challenge in dealing with invasive plant species is that they seldom represent a uniform, static entity. Often, an accurate understanding of the history of plant introduction and knowledge of the real levels of genetic diversity present in species and populations of importance is lacking. Currently, the role of genetic diversity in promoting the successful establishment of invasive plants is not well defined. Genetic profiling of invasive plants should enhance our understanding of the dynamics of colonization in the invaded range. Recent advances in DNA sequencing technology have greatly facilitated the rapid and complete assessment of plant population genetics. Here, we apply our current understanding of the genetics and ecophysiology of plant invasions to recent work on Australian plant invaders from the Cucurbitaceae and Boraginaceae. The Cucurbitaceae study showed that both prickly paddy melon (

Indexed as

DNA barcodinggenetic profileinvasion historyplant invasionsequencing technology

Identifiers

PMID27766152
PMCPMC5069847

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.