Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766122›Full record

ArticleCurrent therapeutic research, clinical and experimental

Preclinical Evaluation of Tolerability of a Selective, Bacteriostatic, Locally Active Vaginal Formulation.

Luca Ivan Ardolino, Marisa Meloni, Giuseppe Brugali, Emanuela Corsini, Corrado Lodovico Galli

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Luca Ivan ArdolinoEffik Italia S.p.A., Cinisello Balsamo, Italy.
Marisa MeloniVitroScreen Srl, Milan, Italy.
Giuseppe BrugaliStudio Brugali Food & Chemical Consulting, Almenno S. Salvatore, Italy.
Emanuela CorsiniLaboratory of Toxicology, DiSFeB, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Corrado Lodovico GalliLaboratory of Toxicology, DiSFeB, Università degli Studi di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPolybactum (Effik International, Brussels, Belgium) is a vaginal mucoadhesive product (medical device) designed to form a film that acts as a mechanical barrier with the aim of inhibiting colonization by specific pathogens. It contains polycarbophil, a bioadhesive agent, and lauryl glucoside (LG), a nonionic surfactant that reinforces the barrier effect through its tensioactive properties.

objectiveTo assess the local safety profile, tolerability, and efficacy of Polybactum formulations.

methodsThe following studies were performed on 3 Polybactum formulations: 2 ovules (Type 1: LG 0.04% and Type 2: LG 0.1%) and 1 gel formulation. Bacteriologic tests assessing the effects on normal vaginal flora and pathogens; in vitro and in vivo tests designed to assess cytotoxicity, as well as irritant and sensitizing potentials; biocompatibility, barrier, residence time, and absorption tests using reconstituted human vaginal epithelium were performed.

resultsPolybactum is a selective bacteriostatic agent that is active against

conclusionsThis favorable preclinical profile is encouraging and supports clinical studies on Polybactum Type 1 ovules for the prevention and management of recurring bacterial vaginosis.

Indexed as

bacterial vaginosisbacteriostatic agentlauryl glucosidepolycarbophilpregnancy infectious complicationsStreptococcus agalactiae

Identifiers

PMID27766122
PMCPMC5067097

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.