Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766115›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mental health systems2016

STRESS-testing clinical activity and outcomes for a combined prison in-reach and court liaison service: a 3-year observational study of 6177 consecutive male remands.

Conor O'Neill, Damian Smith, Martin Caddow, Fergal Duffy, Philip Hickey, Mary Fitzpatrick, Fintan Caddow, Tom Cronin, Mark Joynt, Zetti Azvee and 11 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mental health systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06018298 (Evaluation of Excellence in Italy's Residences for Execution of Security Measures), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06018298 completednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Evaluation of Excellence in Italy's Residences for Execution of Security Measures

TypeobservationalSponsorUniversity of BariRan2018 to 2022Enrolled245ConditionsMental Disorder, Recovery, Schizophrenia and Related Disorders, Personality Disorders and Disturbances in BehaviorArmsTreatment as usual (TAU)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Conor O'Neill *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-0505-6997
Damian Smith *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Martin Caddow *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Fergal Duffy *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Philip Hickey *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Mary Fitzpatrick *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Fintan Caddow *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Tom Cronin *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Mark Joynt *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Zetti Azvee *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Bronagh Gallagher *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Claire Kehoe *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Catherine Maddock *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Benjamin O'Keeffe *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Louise Brennan *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Mary Davoren *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Elizabeth Owens *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Ronan Mullaney *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.
Laurence Keevans *Irish Prison Service, Dublin, Ireland.
Ronan Maher *Irish Prison Service, Dublin, Ireland.
Harry G Kennedy *National Forensic Mental Health Service, Central Mental Hospital, Dundrum, Dublin, 14 Ireland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPeople with major mental illness are over-represented in prison populations however there are few longitudinal studies of prison in-reach services leading to appropriate healthcare over extended periods.

aimsWe aimed to examine measures of the clinical efficiency and effectiveness of a prison in-reach, court diversion and liaison service over a 3 year period. Secondly, we aimed to compare rates of identification of psychosis and diversion with rates previously reported for the same setting in the 6 years previously. We adopted a stress testing model for service evaluation.

methodAll new male remand committals to Ireland's main remand prison from 2012 to 2014 were screened in two stages. Demographic and clinical variables were recorded along with times to assessment and diversion. The DUNDRUM Toolkit was used to assess level of clinical urgency and level of security required. Binary logistic regression was used to assess factors relevant to diversion.

resultsAll 6177 consecutive remands were screened of whom 1109 remand episodes (917 individuals) received a psychiatric assessment. 4.1 % (95 % CI 3.6-4.6) had active psychotic symptoms. Levels of self-harm were low. Median time to full assessment was 2 days and median time to admission was 15.0 days for local hospitals and 19.5 days for forensic admissions. Diversion to healthcare settings outside prison was achieved for 5.6 % (349/6177, 95 % CI 5.1-6.3) of all remand episodes and admissions for 2.3 % (95 % CI 1.9-2.7). Both were increased on the previous period reported. Mean DUNDRUM-1 and DUNDRUM-2 Triage Security Scores were appropriate to risk and need.

conclusionsWe found that a two-stage screening and referral process followed by comprehensive assessment optimised identification of acute psychosis. The mapping approach described shows that it is possible for a relatively small team to sustainably achieve effective identification of major mental illness and diversion to healthcare in a risk-appropriate manner. The stress-testing structure adopted aids service evaluation and may help advise development of outcome standards for similar services.

Indexed as

Clinical pathwaysCourt diversionCourt liaisonPrison psychiatryRisk assessmentScreening

Identifiers

PMID27766115
PMCPMC5057273

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.