Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766110›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in zoology2016

Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) as a bridge between ecology and evolutionary genomics.

Seth Bybee, Alex Córdoba-Aguilar, M Catherine Duryea, Ryo Futahashi, Bengt Hansson, M Olalla Lorenzo-Carballa, Ruud Schilder, Robby Stoks, Anton Suvorov, Erik I Svensson and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in zoology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed
10.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 117 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. The effect of theBiology letters · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 10 institutions in 8 countries.

Seth BybeeBrigham Young University, Provo, UT 84606 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6224-6303
Alex Córdoba-AguilarDepartmento de Ecología Evolutiva, Instituto de Ecología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Apdo, Postal 70-275, Ciudad Universitaria, 04510 Mexico City, Mexico.
M Catherine DuryeaEvolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Ryo FutahashiBioproduction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Central 6, Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8566 Japan.
Bengt HanssonEvolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
M Olalla Lorenzo-CarballaInstitute of Integrative Biology, Biosciences Building, University of Liverpool, Crown Street, Liverpool, L69 7ZB UK.
Ruud SchilderDepartments of Entomology and Biology, Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802 USA.
Robby StoksLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, Department of Biology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Anton SuvorovDepartment of Biology, Brigham Young University, LSB 4102, Provo, UT 84602 USA.
Erik I SvenssonEvolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden.
Janne SwaegersLaboratory of Aquatic Ecology, Evolution and Conservation, Department of Biology, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Yuma TakahashiDivision of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Tohoku University, 6-3, Aoba, Aramaki, Aoba, Sendai, Miyagi 980-8578 Japan.
Phillip C WattsDepartment of Ecology, University of Oulu, Oulu, 90014 Finland.
Maren WellenreutherEvolutionary Ecology Unit, Department of Biology, Lund University, 223 62 Lund, Sweden ; Plant and Food Research Limited, Nelson, 7010 New Zealand.
Lund University · SEBrigham Young University · USKU Leuven · BEInstituto de Ecología · MXNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPPennsylvania State University · USPlant & Food Research · NZTohoku University · JPUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Oulu · FI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Odonata (dragonflies and damselflies) present an unparalleled insect model to integrate evolutionary genomics with ecology for the study of insect evolution. Key features of Odonata include their ancient phylogenetic position, extensive phenotypic and ecological diversity, several unique evolutionary innovations, ease of study in the wild and usefulness as bioindicators for freshwater ecosystems worldwide. In this review, we synthesize studies on the evolution, ecology and physiology of odonates, highlighting those areas where the integration of ecology with genomics would yield significant insights into the evolutionary processes that would not be gained easily by working on other animal groups. We argue that the unique features of this group combined with their complex life cycle, flight behaviour, diversity in ecological niches and their sensitivity to anthropogenic change make odonates a promising and fruitful taxon for genomics focused research. Future areas of research that deserve increased attention are also briefly outlined.

Indexed as

Ancient insectsClimate changeComplex life cycleEcological GenomicsFlightNaiadNGSPolymorphism

Identifiers

PMID27766110
PMCPMC5057408
OpenAlexW2530733897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.