ReviewThrombosis journal2016
DOACs - advances and limitations in real world.
Review in Thrombosis journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
39 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 88 citations in OpenAlex.
- Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in venous thromboembolism patients: a meta-analysis of real-world studies.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Pooled it
- Safety of direct oral anticoagulants in patients with mild to moderate cirrhosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis · 2021Pooled it
- Non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) post-percutaneous coronary intervention: a network meta-analysis.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019Pooled it
- Effectiveness and Safety of Apixaban versus Warfarin as Outpatient Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism in U.S. Clinical Practice.Thrombosis and haemostasis · 2018Trial
- Potential Role of Contact Pathway Factors in Catheter-Related Thrombosis: Emerging Evidence and Therapeutic Strategies.Biomolecules · 2026Review
- Rivaroxaban versus warfarin: differential effects on oxidative stress and fibrinolytic markers in atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2026Article
- Apixaban in Abdominal Transplantation: An Antithrombotic Stewardship Assessment.Advances in hematology · 2026Article
- Rapid Determination of Xa Inhibitor Activity in Blood Using a Microfluidic Device that Measures Platelet Deposition and Fibrin Generation Under Flow.TH open : companion journal to thrombosis and haemostasis · 2025Article
- Direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) monitoring within primary care: a quality improvement project.BMJ open quality · 2023Article
- Review
- Submassive Pulmonary Embolism in the Setting of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Case of Suction Thrombectomy.Cureus · 2022Article
- Genetic variations in relation to bleeding and pharmacodynamics of dabigatran in Chinese patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: A nationwide multicentre prospective cohort study.Clinical and translational medicine · 2022Article
- Marine Biological Macromolecules and Chemically Modified Macromolecules; Potential Anticoagulants.Marine drugs · 2022Review
- Proximal femur fractures in patients taking anti-coagulants: has anything changed?EFORT open reviews · 2022Review
- Drive-Through Anticoagulation Clinic During the COVID-19 Pandemic.The journal for nurse practitioners : JNP · 2022Article
- Article
- Population pharmacokinetic analysis for dabigatran etexilate in Chinese patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2022Article
- Prevalence and the factors associated with oral anticoagulant use among nursing home residents.Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics · 2021Article
- Article
- Thrombophilia testing in the era of direct oral anticoagulants.Clinical medicine (London, England) · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The group of new oral anticoagulants or NOACs, now termed direct oral anticoagulants or DOACs, with their favourable results from large scale phase III clinical trials, represent a major advancement and expanded armamentarium in antithrombotic therapy. Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban and edoxaban are now in clinical routine use for prevention and treatment of arterial and venous thrombotic diseases as addressed in their clinical trials. Usage of the DOACs is expected to increase as clinicians gain more experience and reassurance with data from the real world studies which are generally consistent with that from clinical trials. Development of specific antidotes in management of bleeding complications and development of coagulation assays for their plasma levels will further boost the confidence in the DOACs. Nonetheless, there are still limitations associated with the DOACs. Many patients in need of anticoagulant therapy for indications not studied in the clinical trials will not be eligible for treatment with a DOAC. Conditions where more data is required include DOACs use in the paediatric age group, patients with atrial fibrillation and valvular heart disease, thrombosis associated with the anti-phospholipid syndrome and cancer associated thrombosis. The affordability and access to these drugs may pose an issue for many patients under healthcare systems not providing for these medications. With four new anticoagulants coming onboard very quickly, the focus has shifted to the practical approach and management in real life as many clinicians are not yet familiar with the DOACs. Clinicians need to be educated on how to manage this new class for drugs, from choosing the appropriate drug to prevention and managing bleeding complications as a lack of knowledge and understanding in these drugs will lead to inappropriate use and compromise on patient safety.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.