ArticleJournal of equine veterinary science2016
Genome Editing in Large Animals.
Article in Journal of equine veterinary science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019Pooled it
- Perspectives in Genome-Editing Techniques for Livestock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023Review
- Cas9-mediated replacement of expanded CAG repeats in a pig model of Huntington's disease.Nature biomedical engineering · 2023Article
- Emerging Roles of Noncoding RNAs in Bovine Mastitis Diseases.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Use of Genome Editing Techniques to Produce Transgenic Farm Animals.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022Review
- Ethics: use and misuse of assisted reproductive techniques across species.Reproduction & fertility · 2021Article
- Impact of CRISPR-Cas9-Based Genome Engineering in Farm Animals.Veterinary sciences · 2021Review
- CRISPR/Cas-Dependent and Nuclease-FreeHuman gene therapy · 2021Review
- From Mice to Monkeys? Beyond Orthodox Approaches to the Ethics of Animal Model Choice.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2020Article
- Advances in genome editing for improved animal breeding: A review.Veterinary world · 2017Review
- Translational Advances in the Field of Pulmonary Hypertension Molecular Medicine of Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension. From Population Genetics to Precision Medicine and Gene Editing.American journal of respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome editing in large animals has tremendous practical applications, from more accurate models for medical research through improved animal welfare and production efficiency. Although genetic modification in large animals has a 30 year history, until recently technical issues limited its utility. The original methods - pronuclear injection and integrating viruses - were plagued with problems associated with low efficiency, silencing, poor regulation of gene expression, and variability associated with random integration. With the advent of site specific nucleases such as TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9, precision editing became possible. When used on their own, these can be used to truncate or knockout genes through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) with relatively high efficiency. When used with a template containing desired gene edits, these can be used to allow insertion of any desired changes to the genome through homologous recombination (HR) with substantially lower efficiency. Consideration must be given to the issues of marker sets and off-target effects. Somatic cell nuclear transfer is most commonly used to create animals from gene edited cells, but direct zygote injection and use of spermatogonial stem cells are alternatives under development. In developing gene editing projects, priority must be given to understanding the potential for off-target or unexpected effects of planned edits, which have been common in the past. Because of the increasing technical sophistication with which it can be accomplished, genome editing is poised to revolutionize large animal genetics, but attention must be paid to the underlying biology in order to maximize benefit.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.