Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27766006›Full record

ArticleJournal of equine veterinary science2016

Genome Editing in Large Animals.

James West, W Warren Gill

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of equine veterinary science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. The ethics of genome editing in non-human animals: a systematic review of reasons reported in the academic literature.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Perspectives in Genome-Editing Techniques for Livestock.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Use of Genome Editing Techniques to Produce Transgenic Farm Animals.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. CRISPR/Cas-Dependent and Nuclease-FreeHuman gene therapy · 2021
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

James WestAgGenetics, Nashville, TN; Department of Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
W Warren GillAgGenetics, Nashville, TN; School of Agribusiness and Agriscience, Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, TN.

Funding

Interventions Against the Molecular Etiology of BMPR2-induced PAHR01HL095797 · NHLBI · VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER · PI WEST, JAMES D · 2010 to 2022
$6.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL095797
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome editing in large animals has tremendous practical applications, from more accurate models for medical research through improved animal welfare and production efficiency. Although genetic modification in large animals has a 30 year history, until recently technical issues limited its utility. The original methods - pronuclear injection and integrating viruses - were plagued with problems associated with low efficiency, silencing, poor regulation of gene expression, and variability associated with random integration. With the advent of site specific nucleases such as TALEN and CRISPR/Cas9, precision editing became possible. When used on their own, these can be used to truncate or knockout genes through non-homologous end joining (NHEJ) with relatively high efficiency. When used with a template containing desired gene edits, these can be used to allow insertion of any desired changes to the genome through homologous recombination (HR) with substantially lower efficiency. Consideration must be given to the issues of marker sets and off-target effects. Somatic cell nuclear transfer is most commonly used to create animals from gene edited cells, but direct zygote injection and use of spermatogonial stem cells are alternatives under development. In developing gene editing projects, priority must be given to understanding the potential for off-target or unexpected effects of planned edits, which have been common in the past. Because of the increasing technical sophistication with which it can be accomplished, genome editing is poised to revolutionize large animal genetics, but attention must be paid to the underlying biology in order to maximize benefit.

Identifiers

PMID27766006
PMCPMC5067081

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.