ArticleThe British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science2016
Extremism, religion and psychiatric morbidity in a population-based sample of young men.
Article in The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mental Health, Well-Being, and Adolescent Extremism: A Machine Learning Study on Risk and Protective Factors.Research on child and adolescent psychopathology · 2023Article
- [Experiences of dangerous situations in psychiatry and psychotherapy involving patients with extremist attitudes].Der Nervenarzt · 2023Article
- Sympathy-Empathy and the Radicalization of Young People.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Violent Radicalization and Post-traumatic Dissociation: Clinical Case of a Young Adolescent Girl Radicalized.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- A Clinical and Psychopathological Approach to Radicalization Among Adolescents.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2022Article
- Not in Their Right Mind? Right-Wing Extremism Is Not a Mental Illness, but Still a Challenge for Psychiatry.Frontiers in sociology · 2022Article
- Cognitive and behavioral radicalization: A systematic review of the putative risk and protective factors.Campbell systematic reviews · 2021Review
- Extremism and common mental illness: cross-sectional community survey of White British and Pakistani men and women living in England.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2020Article
- From social adversity to sympathy for violent radicalization: the role of depression, religiosity and social support.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2019Article
- Do Radicalized Minors Have Different Social and Psychological Profiles From Radicalized Adults?Frontiers in psychiatry · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is growing risk from terrorism following radicalisation of young men. It is unclear whether psychopathology is associated.
aimsTo investigate the population distribution of extremist views among UK men.
methodCross-sectional study of 3679 men, 18-34 years, in Great Britain. Multivariate analyses of attitudes, psychiatric morbidity, ethnicity and religion.
resultsPro-British men were more likely to be White, UK born, not religious; anti-British were Muslim, religious, of Pakistani origin, from deprived areas. Pro- and anti-British views were linearly associated with violence (adjusted odds ratio (OR) = 1.51, 95% CI 1.38-1.64, P<0.001, adjusted OR = 1.33, 95% CI 1.13-1.58, P<0.001, respectively) and negatively with depression (adjusted OR = 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.85, P<0.001, adjusted OR = 0.64, 95% CI 0.48-0.86, P = 0.003, respectively).
conclusionsMen at risk of depression may experience protection from strong cultural or religious identity. Antisocial behaviour increases with extremism. Religion is protective but may determine targets of violence following radicalisation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.