Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27765740›Full record

ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2017

Endovascular Therapy of M2 Occlusion in IMS III: Role of M2 Segment Definition and Location on Clinical and Revascularization Outcomes.

T A Tomsick, J Carrozzella, L Foster, M D Hill, R von Kummer, M Goyal, A M Demchuk, P Khatri, Y Palesch, J P Broderick and 3 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Angiographic Systems for Classifying Distal Arterial Occlusions.Cerebrovascular diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Diagnostic accuracy of automated occlusion detection in CT angiography using e-CTA.International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Mechanical thrombectomy in acute middle cerebral artery M2 segment occlusion with regard to vessel involvement.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2020
    Article
  14. Aspiration thrombectomy as the first-line treatment of M2 occlusions.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020
    Article
  15. ADAPT technique in ischemic stroke treatment of M2 middle cerebral artery occlusions in comparison to M1 occlusions: Post hoc analysis of the PROMISE study.Interventional neuroradiology : journal of peritherapeutic neuroradiology, surgical procedures and related neurosciences · 2020
    Article
  16. Meta-Analysis of Endovascular Treatment for Acute M2 Occlusion.Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society · 2019
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Caution; Confusion Ahead….AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

T A TomsickFrom the Department of Radiology (T.A.T., J.C.), University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, University Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio Thomas.Tomsick@UCHealth.com.ORCID 0000-0002-8053-1551
J CarrozzellaFrom the Department of Radiology (T.A.T., J.C.), University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, University Hospital, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0001-6130-4057
L FosterDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology (L.F., Y.P., S.D.Y.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-6856-5583
M D HillCalgary Stroke Program (M.D.H., A.M.D.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medicine, Community Health Sciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6269-1543
R von KummerDepartment of Neuroradiology (R.v.K.), Dresden University Stroke Center, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carusan deTechnischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-0119-4604
M GoyalDepartment of Radiology and Clinical Neurosciences (M.G.), University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-9060-2109
A M DemchukCalgary Stroke Program (M.D.H., A.M.D.), Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Medicine, Community Health Sciences, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, Foothills Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-4930-7789
P KhatriDepartment of Neurology (P.K., J.P.B.), University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-7344-8266
Y PaleschDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology (L.F., Y.P., S.D.Y.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0003-3434-8550
J P BroderickDepartment of Neurology (P.K., J.P.B.), University of Cincinnati Academic Health Center, Cincinnati, Ohio.ORCID 0000-0002-7323-7709
S D YeattsDepartment of Biostatistics, Bioinformatics, and Epidemiology (L.F., Y.P., S.D.Y.), Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina.ORCID 0000-0001-9235-0670
D S LiebeskindUniversity of California Los Angeles Stroke Center (D.S.L.), Los Angeles, California.ORCID 0000-0002-5109-8736
IMS III Investigators
Medical University of South Carolina · USUniversity of Calgary · CACincinnati Health Department · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity Hospital Carl Gustav Carus · DEUniversity of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

Interventional Management of Stroke Study (IMS III)U01NS052220 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CINCINNATI · PI BRODERICK, JOSEPH PAUL · 2005 to 2012
$21.9M
Interventional Management of Stroke Phase III Trial - SDCCU01NS077304 · NINDS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI PALESCH, YUKO Y · 2011 to 2013
$1.4M
NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS052220NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS077304
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeUncertainty persists regarding the safety and efficacy of endovascular therapy of M2 occlusions following IV tPA. We reviewed the impact of revascularization on clinical outcomes in 83 patients with M2 occlusions in the Interventional Management of Stroke III trial according to specific M1-M2 segment anatomic features. MATERIALS AND

methodsPerfusion of any M2 branch distinguished M2-versus-M1 occlusion. Prespecified modified TICI and arterial occlusive lesion revascularization and clinical mRS 0-2 end points at 90 days for endovascular therapy-treated M2 occlusions were analyzed. Post hoc analyses of the relationship of outcomes to multiple baseline angiographic M2 and M1 subgroup characteristics were performed.

resultsOf 83 participants with M2 occlusion who underwent endovascular therapy, 41.0% achieved mRS 0-2 at 90 days, including 46.6% with modified TICI 2-3 reperfusion compared with 26.1% with modified TICI 0-1 reperfusion (risk difference, 20.6%; 95% CI, -1.4%-42.5%). mRS 0-2 outcome was associated with reperfusion for M2 trunk (n = 9) or M2 division (n = 42) occlusions, but not for M2 branch occlusions (n = 28). Of participants with trunk and division occlusions, 63.2% with modified TICI 2a and 42.9% with modified TICI 2b reperfusion achieved mRS 0-2 outcomes; mRS 0-2 outcomes for M2 trunk occlusions (33%) did not differ from distal (38.2%) and proximal (26.9%) M1 occlusions.

conclusionsmRS 0-2 at 90 days was dependent on reperfusion for M2 trunk but not for M2 branch occlusions. For M2 division occlusions, good outcome with modified TICI 2b reperfusion did not differ from that in modified TICI 2a. M2 segment definition and occlusion location may contribute to differences in revascularization and good outcome between Interventional Management of Stroke III and other endovascular therapy studies.

Indexed as

AgedArterial Occlusive DiseasesCerebral RevascularizationCerebrovascular DisordersEndovascular ProceduresFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedStrokeTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID27765740
PMCPMC7963682
OpenAlexW2538682264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.