Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27765735›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2016

A process evaluation of the WHiTE Two trial comparing total hip arthroplasty with and without dual mobility component in the treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur: Can a trial investigating total hip arthroplasty for hip fracture be delivered in the NHS?

C Huxley, J Achten, M L Costa, F Griffiths, X L Griffin

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

C HuxleyUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Social Science and Systems in Health, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
J AchtenUniversity of Oxford, NDORMS, Kadoorie Centre, Level 3 John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
M L CostaUniversity of Oxford, NDORMS, Kadoorie Centre, Level 3 John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK.
F GriffithsUniversity of Warwick, Warwick Medical School, Social Science and Systems in Health, Coventry, CV4 7AL, UK.
X L GriffinUniversity of Oxford, NDORMS, Kadoorie Centre, Level 3 John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK xavier.griffin@ndorms.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Department of Health RP-DG-1210-10022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe annual incidence of hip fracture is 620 000 in the European Union. The cost of this clinical problem has been estimated at 1.75 million disability-adjusted life years lost, equating to 1.4% of the total healthcare burden in established market economies. Recent guidance from The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) states that research into the clinical and cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty (THA) as a treatment for hip fracture is a priority. We asked the question: can a trial investigating THA for hip fracture currently be delivered in the NHS?

methodsWe performed a contemporaneous process evaluation that provides a context for the interpretation of the findings of WHiTE Two - a randomised study of THA for hip fracture. We developed a mixed methods approach to situate the trial centre within the context of wider United Kingdom clinical practice. We focused on fidelity, implementation, acceptability and feasibility of both the trial processes and interventions to stakeholder groups, such as healthcare providers and patients.

resultsWe have shown that patients are willing to participate in this type of research and that surgeons value being part of a team that has a strong research ethos. However, surgical practice does not currently reflect NICE guidance. Current models of service delivery for hip fractures are unlikely to be able to provide timely total hip arthroplasty for suitable patients.

conclusionsFurther observational research should be conducted to define the population of interest before future interventional studies are performed.Cite this article: C. Huxley, J. Achten, M. L. Costa, F. Griffiths, X. L. Griffin. A process evaluation of the WHiTE Two trial comparing total hip artroplasty with and without dual mobility component in the treatment of displaced intracapsular fractures of the proximal femur: Can a trial investigating total hip arthroplasty for hip fracture be delivered in the NHS? Bone Joint Res 2016;5:444-452. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.510.BJR-2015-0008.R1.

Indexed as

Hip fractureProcess assessment (health care)Total hip arthroplasty

Identifiers

PMID27765735
PMCPMC5062090
OpenAlexW2528496085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.