ArticleThe lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology2016
Exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in the USA: a population-based disease burden and cost analysis.
Article in The lancet. Diabetes & endocrinology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 4 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 96 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Personalized Mobile Intervention to Reduce Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals (EDCs) in Women of Child-Bearing Age and Their Partners
A Personalized Digital Intervention Program to Reduce Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals Among a Child-Bearing Age Cohort
Minority-focused Environmental Health Education and Tracking (MEET) Pilot Study
Endocrine Disruptors and Men's Reproductive Health: A Randomized Behavioral Intervention to Increase Environmental Health Literacy and Reduce Exposures Among Men With Low Semen Quality
Who cites it
96 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 288 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Review of Biomonitoring for Atrazine and Atrazine Metabolites Using Blood, Urine, and Sweat-Based Assays.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Pooled it
- Association between Exposure toEnvironmental health perspectives · 2017Pooled it
- Review
- Molecular Mechanisms of Endocrine-Disrupting Chemicals and Emerging-Pollutant Toxicity in Human Reproduction: From Xenobiotic Exposure to Fertility Impairment and Reproductive Carcinogenesis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Endocrine-disrupting chemicals in aquatic ecosystems and their impacts on aquatic organisms and humans with advances in detection and remediation.Journal of Zhejiang University. Science. B · 2026Review
- Role of antioxidant vitamins in mitigating the health risks from environmental toxicant exposures: a narrative review.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2026Review
- Development and validation of a novel senescence-associated gene signature for prediction of survival and endocrine-disrupting chemicals in bladder cancer.Discover oncology · 2026Article
- What do people need to know about endocrine disrupting chemicals and health? A mental models approach using focus groups of community-engaged research teams and a national survey.BMC public health · 2025Article
- A Review of the Evidence of the Toxicity of Chemical Substances Included in the European Union Ambient Air Quality and Drinking Water Directives: Perspectives for Health Impact Assessments.Environment & health (Washington, D.C.) · 2025Review
- Health impacts of exposure to synthetic chemicals in food.Nature medicine · 2025Review
- Using machine learning to investigate the influence of the prenatal chemical exposome on neurodevelopment of young children.Neurotoxicology · 2025Article
- Global Burden of Disease from Environmental Factors.Annual review of public health · 2025Review
- Urinary phthalate metabolites associated with increased prevalence of gallstone disease in U.S. adults: data from the NHANES study.BMC public health · 2025Article
- A deep-learning approach to predict reproductive toxicity of chemicals using communicative message passing neural network.Frontiers in toxicology · 2025Article
- The benefits of removing toxic chemicals from plastics.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2024Article
- Public Health Risks of PFAS-Related Immunotoxicity Are Real.Current environmental health reports · 2024Review
- Environmental Exposures and Pediatric Cardiology: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.Circulation · 2024Review
- The Conflict between Regulatory Agencies over the 20,000-Fold Lowering of the Tolerable Daily Intake (TDI) for Bisphenol A (BPA) by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA).Environmental health perspectives · 2024Article
- Empowering Student Pharmacists to Counsel Patients on Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals through Interactive Role-Play.Pharmacy (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Plastic Food Packaging from Five Countries Contains Endocrine- and Metabolism-Disrupting Chemicals.Environmental science & technology · 2024Article
36 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
9 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) contribute to disease and dysfunction and incur high associated costs (>1% of the gross domestic product [GDP] in the European Union). Exposure to EDCs varies widely between the USA and Europe because of differences in regulations and, therefore, we aimed to quantify disease burdens and related economic costs to allow comparison.
methodsWe used existing models for assessing epidemiological and toxicological studies to reach consensus on probabilities of causation for 15 exposure-response relations between substances and disorders. We used Monte Carlo methods to produce realistic probability ranges for costs across the exposure-response relation, taking into account uncertainties. Estimates were made based on population and costs in the USA in 2010. Costs for the European Union were converted to US$ (€1=$1·33).
findingsThe disease costs of EDCs were much higher in the USA than in Europe ($340 billion [2·33% of GDP] vs $217 billion [1·28%]). The difference was driven mainly by intelligence quotient (IQ) points loss and intellectual disability due to polybrominated diphenyl ethers (11 million IQ points lost and 43 000 cases costing $266 billion in the USA vs 873 000 IQ points lost and 3290 cases costing $12·6 billion in the European Union). Accounting for probability of causation, in the European Union, organophosphate pesticides were the largest contributor to costs associated with EDC exposure ($121 billion), whereas in the USA costs due to pesticides were much lower ($42 billion).
interpretationEDC exposure in the USA contributes to disease and dysfunction, with annual costs taking up more than 2% of the GDP. Differences from the European Union suggest the need for improved screening for chemical disruption to endocrine systems and proactive prevention.
fundingEndocrine Society, Ralph S French Charitable Foundation, and Broad Reach Foundation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.