Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27765010›Full record

Trial reportBMC anesthesiology2016

Dexamethasone does not diminish sugammadex reversal of neuromuscular block - clinical study in surgical patients undergoing general anesthesia.

Katja Rezonja, Tomaz Mars, Ales Jerin, Gordana Kozelj, Neva Pozar-Lukanovic, Maja Sostaric

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMC anesthesiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 20 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katja RezonjaDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Tomaz MarsInstitute of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ales JerinInstitute of Clinical Chemistry and Biochemistry, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Gordana KozeljInstitute of Forensic Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Neva Pozar-LukanovicDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia.
Maja SostaricDepartment of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Zaloška 7, Ljubljana, 1000, Slovenia. maja.sos@siol.net.ORCID 0000-0002-7114-8155
Ljubljana University Medical Centre · SIUniversity of Ljubljana · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSugammadex reverses neuromuscular block (NMB) through binding aminosteroid neuromuscular blocking agents. Although sugammadex appears to be highly selective, it can interact with other drugs, like corticosteroids. A prospective single-blinded randomized clinical trial was designed to explore the significance of interactions between dexamethasone and sugammadex.

methodsSixty-five patients who were anesthetized for elective abdominal or urological surgery were included. NMB was assessed using train-of-four stimulation (TOF), with rocuronium used to maintain the desired NMB depth. NMB reversal at the end of anaesthesia was achieved using sugammadex. According to their received antiemetics, the patients were randomized to either the granisetron or dexamethasone group. Blood samples were taken before and after NMB reversal, for plasma dexamethasone and rocuronium determination. Primary endpoint was time from sugammadex administration to NMB reversal. Secondary endpoints included the ratios of the dexamethasone and rocuronium concentrations after NMB reversal versus before sugammadex administration.

resultsThere were no differences for time to NMB reversal between the control (mean 121 ± 61 s) and the dexamethasone group (mean 125 ± 57 s; P = 0.760). Time to NMB reversal to a TOF ratio ≥0.9 was significantly longer in patients with lower TOF prior to sugammadex administration (Beta = -0.268; P = 0.038). The ratio between the rocuronium concentrations after NMB reversal versus before sugammadex administration was significantly affected by sugammadex dose (Beta = -0.375; P = 0.004), as was rocuronium dose per hour of operation (Beta = -0.366; p = 0.007), while it was not affected by NMB depth before administration of sugammadex (Beta = -0.089; p = 0.483) and dexamethasone (Beta = -0.186; p = 0.131). There was significant drop in plasma dexamethasone after sugammadex administration and NMB reversal (p < 0.001).

conclusionsAdministration of dexamethasone to anesthetized patients did not delay NMB reversal by sugammadex.

trial registrationThe trial was retrospectively registered with The Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) on February 28th 2012 (enrollment of the first patient on February 2nd 2012) and was given a trial ID number ACTRN12612000245897 and universal trial number U1111-1128-5104.

Indexed as

AgedAndrostanolsAnesthesia, GeneralAntiemeticsDexamethasoneDose-Response Relationship, DrugElective Surgical ProceduresFemalegamma-CyclodextrinsGranisetronHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeuromuscular BlockadeNeuromuscular MonitoringNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsAndrostanolsAntiemeticsDexamethasonegamma-CyclodextrinsGranisetronNeuromuscular Nondepolarizing AgentsRocuroniumSugammadexDexamethasoneNeuromuscular blockRocuroniumSugammadex

Identifiers

PMID27765010
PMCPMC5073416
OpenAlexW2538413629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.