Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27764236›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Phenotype and Function of CD209+ Bovine Blood Dendritic Cells, Monocyte-Derived-Dendritic Cells and Monocyte-Derived Macrophages.

Kun Taek Park, Mahmoud M ElNaggar, Gaber S Abdellrazeq, John P Bannantine, Victoria Mack, Lindsay M Fry, William C Davis

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Frontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Microorganisms · 2020
    Article
  14. Bovine DerivedFrontiers in immunology · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Kun Taek ParkDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.
Mahmoud M ElNaggarDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.
Gaber S AbdellrazeqDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.
John P BannantineUSDA, ARS, National Animal Disease Center, Ames, Iowa, United States of America.
Victoria MackDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.
Lindsay M FryDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.
William C DavisDepartment of Veterinary Microbiology and Pathology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, United States of America.
Washington State University · USAlexandria University · EGNational Animal Disease Center · USSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Phylogenic comparisons of the mononuclear phagocyte system (MPS) of humans and mice demonstrate phenotypic divergence of dendritic cell (DC) subsets that play similar roles in innate and adaptive immunity. Although differing in phenotype, DC can be classified into four groups according to ontogeny and function: conventional DC (cDC1 and cDC2), plasmacytoid DC (pDC), and monocyte derived DC (MoDC). DC of Artiodactyla (pigs and ruminants) can also be sub-classified using this system, allowing direct functional and phenotypic comparison of MoDC and other DC subsets trafficking in blood (bDC). Because of the high volume of blood collections required to study DC, cattle offer the best opportunity to further our understanding of bDC and MoDC function in an outbred large animal species. As reported here, phenotyping DC using a monoclonal antibody (mAb) to CD209 revealed CD209 is expressed on the major myeloid population of DC present in blood and MoDC, providing a phenotypic link between these two subsets. Additionally, the present study demonstrates that CD209 is also expressed on monocyte derived macrophages (MoΦ). Functional analysis revealed each of these populations can take up and process antigens (Ags), present them to CD4 and CD8 T cells, and elicit a T-cell recall response. Thus, bDC, MoDC, and MoΦ pulsed with pathogens or candidate vaccine antigens can be used to study factors that modulate DC-driven T-cell priming and differentiation ex vivo.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDArtiodactylaCattleCell Adhesion MoleculesCell DifferentiationCells, CulturedDC-Specific ICAM-3 Grabbing NonintegrinDendritic CellsGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorInterleukin-4Lectins, C-TypeLeukocytes, MononuclearMacrophagesMaleAntibodies, MonoclonalAntigens, CDCell Adhesion MoleculesDC-Specific ICAM-3 Grabbing NonintegrinGranulocyte-Macrophage Colony-Stimulating FactorInterleukin-4Lectins, C-TypeReceptors, Cell Surface

Identifiers

PMID27764236
PMCPMC5072659
OpenAlexW2532333441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.