Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27764198›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

Comparative Analysis of Membrane Vesicles from Three Piscirickettsia salmonis Isolates Reveals Differences in Vesicle Characteristics.

Julia I Tandberg, Leidy X Lagos, Petter Langlete, Eva Berger, Anne-Lise Rishovd, Norbert Roos, Deepa Varkey, Ian T Paulsen, Hanne C Winther-Larsen

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. [Cu(NNInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Collective behavior and virulence arsenal of the fish pathogenFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The Phagosome-Lysosome Fusion Is the Target of a PurifiedAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. The Proteome of Biologically Active Membrane Vesicles fromFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Julia I TandbergCenter of Integrative Microbiology and Evolution, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Leidy X LagosCenter of Integrative Microbiology and Evolution, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Petter LangleteCenter of Integrative Microbiology and Evolution, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Eva BergerDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Anne-Lise RishovdDepartment of Pharmaceutical Biosciences, School of Pharmacy, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Norbert RoosDepartment of Biosciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Deepa VarkeyDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Ian T PaulsenDepartment of Chemistry and Biomolecular Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Hanne C Winther-LarsenCenter of Integrative Microbiology and Evolution, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
University of Oslo · NOMacquarie University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Membrane vesicles (MVs) are spherical particles naturally released from the membrane of Gram-negative bacteria. Bacterial MV production is associated with a range of phenotypes including biofilm formation, horizontal gene transfer, toxin delivery, modulation of host immune responses and virulence. This study reports comparative profiling of MVs from bacterial strains isolated from three widely disperse geographical areas. Mass spectrometry identified 119, 159 and 142 proteins in MVs from three different strains of Piscirickettsia salmonis isolated from salmonids in Chile (LF-89), Norway (NVI 5692) and Canada (NVI 5892), respectively. MV comparison revealed several strain-specific differences related to higher virulence capability for LF-89 MVs, both in vivo and in vitro, and stronger similarities between the NVI 5692 and NVI 5892 MV proteome. The MVs were similar in size and appearance as analyzed by electron microscopy and dynamic light scattering. The MVs from all three strains were internalized by both commercial and primary immune cell cultures, which suggest a potential role of the MVs in the bacterium's utilization of leukocytes. When MVs were injected into an adult zebrafish infection model, an upregulation of several pro-inflammatory genes were observed in spleen and kidney, indicating a modulating effect on the immune system. The present study is the first comparative analysis of P. salmonis derived MVs, highlighting strain-specific vesicle characteristics. The results further illustrate that the MV proteome from one bacterial strain is not representative of all bacterial strains within one species.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsCanadaChileCytoplasmic VesiclesMass SpectrometryNorwayPiscirickettsiaPiscirickettsiaceae InfectionsProteomicsSalmonidaeVirulence FactorsZebrafishBacterial ProteinsVirulence Factors

Identifiers

PMID27764198
PMCPMC5072724
OpenAlexW2532452621

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.