SynthesisPloS one2016
Genome-Wide Meta-Analysis of Sciatica in Finnish Population.
Synthesis in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- [The EAN-NeuPSIG guideline on the diagnosis of neuropathic pain-a summary].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2026Guideline
- Polygenic risk scores indicates genetic overlap between peripheral pain syndromes and chronic postsurgical pain.Neurogenetics · 2020Trial
- Roles of the NFI/CTF gene family in transcription and development: update 2025.Academia biology · 2025Article
- Can we achieve pain stratification in musculoskeletal conditions? Implications for clinical practice.Frontiers in pain research (Lausanne, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Theoretical Schemas to Guide Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Chronic Low Back Pain Clinical Research.Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.) · 2023Review
- Polycystic ovary syndrome and leukocyte telomere length: cross-sectional and longitudinal changes.European journal of endocrinology · 2022Article
- [Entrapment neuropathies: a contemporary approach to pathophysiology, clinical assessment, and management : German version].Schmerz (Berlin, Germany) · 2021Review
- Low Back Pain With Persistent Radiculopathy; the Clinical Role of Genetic Variants in the Genes SOX5, CCDC26/GSDMC and DCC.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- Analysis of genetically independent phenotypes identifies shared genetic factors associated with chronic musculoskeletal pain conditions.Communications biology · 2020Article
- Intervertebral Disc Biology: Genetic Basis of Disc Degeneration.Current molecular biology reports · 2018Review
- Genetic Insights Into Frailty: Association of 9p21-23 Locus With Frailty.Frontiers in medicine · 2018Article
- The phenotypic and molecular spectrum of PEHO syndrome and PEHO-like disorders.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2017Article
- Entrapment neuropathies: a contemporary approach to pathophysiology, clinical assessment, and management.Pain reportsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors at 10 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Sciatica or the sciatic syndrome is a common and often disabling low back disorder in the working-age population. It has a relatively high heritability but poorly understood molecular mechanisms. The Finnish population is a genetic isolate where small founder population and bottleneck events have led to enrichment of certain rare and low frequency variants. We performed here the first genome-wide association (GWAS) and meta-analysis of sciatica. The meta-analysis was conducted across two GWAS covering 291 Finnish sciatica cases and 3671 controls genotyped and imputed at 7.7 million autosomal variants. The most promising loci (p<1x10-6) were replicated in 776 Finnish sciatica patients and 18,489 controls. We identified five intragenic variants, with relatively low frequencies, at two novel loci associated with sciatica at genome-wide significance. These included chr9:14344410:I (rs71321981) at 9p22.3 (NFIB gene; p = 1.30x10-8, MAF = 0.08) and four variants at 15q21.2: rs145901849, rs80035109, rs190200374 and rs117458827 (MYO5A; p = 1.34x10-8, MAF = 0.06; p = 2.32x10-8, MAF = 0.07; p = 3.85x10-8, MAF = 0.06; p = 4.78x10-8, MAF = 0.07, respectively). The most significant association in the meta-analysis, a single base insertion rs71321981 within the regulatory region of the transcription factor NFIB, replicated in an independent Finnish population sample (p = 0.04). Despite identifying 15q21.2 as a promising locus, we were not able to replicate it. It was differentiated; the lead variants within 15q21.2 were more frequent in Finland (6-7%) than in other European populations (1-2%). Imputation accuracies of the three significantly associated variants (chr9:14344410:I, rs190200374, and rs80035109) were validated by genotyping. In summary, our results suggest a novel locus, 9p22.3 (NFIB), which may be involved in susceptibility to sciatica. In addition, another locus, 15q21.2, emerged as a promising one, but failed to replicate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.