Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27763844›Full record

ArticleCanadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique2016

Examination of a prenatal syphilis screening program, Alberta, Canada: 2010-2011.

Sabrina S Plitt, Mariam Osman, Vanita Sahni, Bonita E Lee, Carmen Charlton, Kimberley Simmonds

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 32% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Uptake of prenatal syphilis screening and its determinants in Ontario, Canada: a population-based retrospective cohort study.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Rising syphilis rates in Canada, 2011-2020.Canada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2022
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Suboptimal prenatal screening ofCanada communicable disease report = Releve des maladies transmissibles au Canada · 2021
    Article
  8. Examination of a Canadian provincial prenatal HIV screening program: 2010 to 2014.Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Sabrina S PlittCentre for Communicable Diseases and Infection Control, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, ON. splitt@ualberta.ca.
Mariam Osman
Vanita Sahni
Bonita E Lee
Carmen Charlton
Kimberley Simmonds
Alberta Health · CAAlberta Health Services · CAPublic Health Agency of Canada · CAUniversity of Alberta · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesIn 2009, due to increasing congenital syphilis rates, prenatal syphilis tests (PST) at both mid-gestation and delivery were added to first trimester prenatal screening in the province of Alberta. We sought to determine the proportion of mothers who had all three recommended PSTs during this period and to identify factors associated with incomplete PST.

methodsA cohort of all pregnancies resulting in a live or stillborn infant in Alberta for 2010 and 2011 was developed from Vital Statistics and linked with prenatal screening data to determine the number and timing of PSTs for pregnant women. The proportion of women who had PSTs at the three recommended time points in pregnancy and associated correlates were identified using basic statistics and logistic regressions.

resultsOf 99,609 pregnancies, 20.7% had all three PSTs at the recommended time points. Overall, 98.5% (98,162) had at least one PST, 1.5% only had PST at delivery and 1.5% had no PST performed. Independent risk factors for not having the three recommended PSTs included First Nations status (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]: 1.78 [95% CI: 1.62-1.96]), rural remote residence (AOR 3.61 [95% CI: 3.10-4.20]) and sole use of a midwife for prenatal care (AOR 13.70 [95% CI: 9.20-20.39]).

conclusionsNearly all pregnant women in Alberta received a PST at least once during their pregnancy, however far fewer received PSTs at the recommended time points. Interventions that target those who are less likely to be prenatally screened may help to ensure that pregnant women get early and appropriate care for syphilis during pregnancy.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAdultAlbertaCohort StudiesFemaleGuideline AdherenceHumansPregnancyPregnancy Trimester, FirstPrenatal DiagnosisProgram EvaluationRisk FactorsSyphilisYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID27763844
PMCPMC6972252
OpenAlexW2535236541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.