Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27763821›Full record

ArticleVector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.)2016

Coxiella Detection in Ticks from Wildlife and Livestock in Malaysia.

Jing-Jing Khoo, Fang-Shiang Lim, Fezshin Chen, Wai-Hong Phoon, Chee-Sieng Khor, Brian L Pike, Li-Yen Chang, Sazaly AbuBakar

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vector borne and zoonotic diseases (Larchmont, N.Y.), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Molecular Detection ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. The Unexpected Holiday Souvenir: The Public Health Risk to UK Travellers from Ticks Acquired Overseas.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jing-Jing Khoo1 Tropical Infectious Diseases Research and Education Centre (TIDREC), University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia .
Fang-Shiang Lim1 Tropical Infectious Diseases Research and Education Centre (TIDREC), University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia .
Fezshin Chen1 Tropical Infectious Diseases Research and Education Centre (TIDREC), University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia .
Wai-Hong Phoon1 Tropical Infectious Diseases Research and Education Centre (TIDREC), University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia .
Chee-Sieng Khor1 Tropical Infectious Diseases Research and Education Centre (TIDREC), University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia .
Brian L Pike3 Naval Medical Research Center-Asia (NMRC-A) , Singapore, Singapore .
Li-Yen Chang1 Tropical Infectious Diseases Research and Education Centre (TIDREC), University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia .
Sazaly AbuBakar1 Tropical Infectious Diseases Research and Education Centre (TIDREC), University of Malaya , Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have shown that ticks harbor Coxiella-like bacteria, which are potentially tick-specific endosymbionts. We recently described the detection of Coxiella-like bacteria and possibly Coxiella burnetii in ticks found from rural areas in Malaysia. In the present study, we collected ticks, including Haemaphysalis bispinosa, Haemaphysalis hystricis, Dermacentor compactus, Dermacentor steini, and Amblyomma sp. from wildlife and domesticated goats from four different locations in Malaysia. Coxiella 16s rRNA genomic sequences were detected by PCR in 89% of ticks tested. Similarity analysis and phylogenetic analyses of the 16s rRNA and rpoB partial sequences were performed for 10 representative samples selected based on the tick species, sex, and location. The findings here suggested the presence of C. burnetii in two samples, each from D. steini and H. hystricis. The sequences of both samples clustered with published C. burnetii sequences. The remaining eight tick samples were shown to harbor 16s rRNA sequences of Coxiella-like bacteria, which clustered phylogenetically according to the respective tick host species. The findings presented here added to the growing evidence of the association between Coxiella-like bacteria and ticks across species and geographical boundaries. The importance of C. burnetii found in ticks in Malaysia warrants further investigation.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, WildBacterial ProteinsCoxiellaDNA, BacterialFemaleGoat DiseasesGoatsLivestockMalaysiaMalePhylogenyRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16STick InfestationsTicksBacterial ProteinsDNA, BacterialRNA, BacterialRNA, Ribosomal, 16SCoxielladomestic animalstickszoonotic

Identifiers

PMID27763821
PMCPMC5144871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.