Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27762341›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

SparRec: An effective matrix completion framework of missing data imputation for GWAS.

Bo Jiang, Shiqian Ma, Jason Causey, Linbo Qiao, Matthew Price Hardin, Ian Bitts, Daniel Johnson, Shuzhong Zhang, Xiuzhen Huang

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bo JiangResearch Center for Management Science and Data Analytics, School of Information Management and Engineering, Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, Shanghai 200433, China.
Shiqian MaDepartment of Systems Engineering and Engineering Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong.
Jason CauseyDepartment of Computer Science, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas 72467, United States of America.
Linbo QiaoCollege of Computer, National University of Defense Technology, Changsha 410073, China.
Matthew Price HardinMolecular Biosciences Program, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas 72467, United States of America.
Ian BittsDepartment of Computer Science, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas 72467, United States of America.
Daniel JohnsonThe University of Tennessee Health Science Center (UTHSC) rBIO Core Lab, Cancer Research Building Rm258, 19 S Manassas St. Memphis, TN 38163, United States of America.
Shuzhong ZhangDepartment of Industrial and Systems Engineering, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, United States of America.
Xiuzhen HuangDepartment of Computer Science, Arkansas State University, Jonesboro, Arkansas 72467, United States of America.

Funding

Understanding Hesitant AdoptersP20GM103429 · NIGMS · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI Lawrence E Cornett, JERRY WARE · 2012 to 2026
$60.9M
VIRULENCE MECHANISMS IN ESCHERICHIA COLIP20RR016460 · NCRR · UNIV OF ARKANSAS FOR MED SCIS · PI HENSLEY, LORI · 2001 to 2011
$33.1M
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR016460NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103429
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genome-wide association studies present computational challenges for missing data imputation, while the advances of genotype technologies are generating datasets of large sample sizes with sample sets genotyped on multiple SNP chips. We present a new framework SparRec (Sparse Recovery) for imputation, with the following properties: (1) The optimization models of SparRec, based on low-rank and low number of co-clusters of matrices, are different from current statistics methods. While our low-rank matrix completion (LRMC) model is similar to Mendel-Impute, our matrix co-clustering factorization (MCCF) model is completely new. (2) SparRec, as other matrix completion methods, is flexible to be applied to missing data imputation for large meta-analysis with different cohorts genotyped on different sets of SNPs, even when there is no reference panel. This kind of meta-analysis is very challenging for current statistics based methods. (3) SparRec has consistent performance and achieves high recovery accuracy even when the missing data rate is as high as 90%. Compared with Mendel-Impute, our low-rank based method achieves similar accuracy and efficiency, while the co-clustering based method has advantages in running time. The testing results show that SparRec has significant advantages and competitive performance over other state-of-the-art existing statistics methods including Beagle and fastPhase.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticSoftwareAnimalsGenome-Wide Association StudyHumans

Identifiers

PMID27762341
PMCPMC5071878

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.