Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27762259›Full record

ArticleMedical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research2016

Inferior Vena Cava Collapsibility Index is a Valuable and Non-Invasive Index for Elevated General Heart End-Diastolic Volume Index Estimation in Septic Shock Patients.

Jie Zhao, Guolin Wang

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03535038 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2018, after this paper: background citation

Agreement Test of Intravascular Volume Assessment Between Inferior Vena Cava (IVC) Diameter and Vascular Pedicle Width (VPW)

TypeinterventionalSponsorIndonesia UniversityRan2018 to 2018Enrolled35ConditionsUnintubated Patients in ICU and Resuscitation RoomArmsInferior vena cava (IVC) diameter using USG, Vascular pedicle width (VPW)
NCT03915587 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2019, after this paper: background citation

Bedside Resources to Gauge Intravascular Volume Status in Hypovolemic Infants in the Operating Room

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Colorado, DenverRan2019 to 2020Enrolled23ConditionsHypovolemia, CraniosynostosesArmsCardioQ-EDM and CipherOx-CRI
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jie ZhaoDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).
Guolin WangDepartment of Intensive Care Unit, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin, China (mainland).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the inferior vena cava respirophasic variation (IVC collapsibility index [IVCCI]) and the general heart end-diastolic volume index (GEDVI). By determining the above relationship, we could evaluate the utility of IVCCI as an indicator. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-two septic patients were finally enrolled in this study. The inferior vena cava's diameter was measured with the largest at the end of expiration (IVC3) and with the smallest at the end of inspiration (IVCi) on the ultrasound (IVCCI=[(IVCD e - IVCD i)/IVCD e] ×100%). The central venous pressure (CVP), cardiac index (CI), and GEDVI were also measured at least 3 times. After fluid resuscitation therapy, the patients with a CI increase induced by more than 15% and less than 15% were classified as the positive response group (PRG) and the negative response group (NRG), respectively. RESULTS After treatment, the average levels of CVP, CI, and GEDVI were significantly higher (P<0.01) in both groups, whereas the IVCCI was reduced. CVP, CI, and GEDVI were negatively correlated with IVCCI in both groups. The correlation coefficient between IVCCI and GEDVI was the greatest (correlation coefficient in the PRG group was 0.889 and in the NRG group it was 0.672). The ROC curve analysis indicated that IVCCI illustrated the best area under the curve, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 100%, and a cut-off value of 12.9% to predict GEDVI <600 ml/m2 in the PRG group. CONCLUSIONS IVCCI was a good predictor of low-volume state. The IVCCI appears to be a valuable and non-invasive index for the estimation of elevated GEDVI during fluid resuscitation in septic shock patients.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAmniotic FluidBlood PressureCentral Venous PressureFemaleFluid TherapyHemodynamicsHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesShock, SepticUltrasonographyVena Cava, Inferior

Identifiers

PMID27762259
PMCPMC5085335

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.