Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27761791›Full record

Trial reportChinese journal of integrative medicine2017

Evaluation of the potential inhibitory activity of a combination of L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus and L. sporogenes on Helicobacter pylori: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled clinical trial.

Chien-Ying Lee, Hung-Che Shih, Min-Chien Yu, Ming-Yung Lee, Ya-Lan Chang, Ya-Yun Lai, Yi-Ching Lee, Yu-Hsiang Kuan, Chun-Che Lin

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Chinese journal of integrative medicine, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Screening Probiotics for Anti-Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  3. Probiotics and autoprobiotics for treatment ofWorld journal of clinical cases · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Evaluation of the Potential Protective Effects ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2022
    Article
  7. Probiotic effect onExperimental and therapeutic medicine · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Chien-Ying LeeInstitute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, 40201, China.
Hung-Che ShihDepartment of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, China.
Min-Chien YuDepartment of Integrated Chinese and Western Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, 40201, China.
Ming-Yung LeeDepartment of Statistics and Informatics Science, Providence University, China, 43301, China.
Ya-Lan ChangDepartment of Pharmacy, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, 40201, China.
Ya-Yun LaiDepartment of Applied Cosmetology, National Tainan Junior College of Nursing, Taiwan, 700, China.
Yi-Ching LeeDepartment of Pharmacy, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, 40201, China.
Yu-Hsiang KuanDepartment of Pharmacy, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan, 40201, China.
Chun-Che LinInstitute of Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan, 40201, China. forest65@ms8.hinet.net.
Chung Shan Medical University · TWChung Shan Medical University Hospital · TWNational Tainan Institute of Nursing · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo investigate whether three strains of probiotics, L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, and L. sporogenes, had signifificant inhibitive effects on Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori).

methodsThis is a 4-week, randomly assigned, parallel-group, doubled-blind, and placebo-controlled study. Fifty patients with a positive H. pylori infection urea breath test (△UBT) result > 10% and without ulcer symptoms were randomized into a treatment group and a placebo group by a computer generated allocation sheet with 1:1. These subjects took one capsule of probiotics or placebo twice daily. The primary measurement was the change in △UBT values.

resultsThe △UBT values during the 4-week treatment period and the 2-week follow-up period were not signifificantly different between the treatment group and the placebo group, indicating that the inhibitive effects on H. pylori were comparable between both groups. The monocyte count (%) was 5.77±1.11 in the treatment group versus 5.09±1.12 in the placebo group (P=0.044), and the basophile count was 0.55±0.32 in the treatment group versus 0.36±0.23 in the placebo group (P=0.024) at week 2 of the treatment period, both of which reached statistical signifificance. The monocyte count was 5.75±1.26 in the treatment group and 4.72±0.99 in the placebo group at the end of the follow-up period (P=0.003).

conclusionThere was no signifificant inhibitive effects of the three probiotic strains (L. acidophilus, L. rhamnosus, and L. sporogenes) on H. pylori. Probiotics can not play the same role as antibiotics in the eradication of H. pylori, the role of probiotics is likely to be important as adjuvant to the triple or quadruple therapy for H. pylori, especially in resistance cases.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBreath TestsDemographyDouble-Blind MethodEndpoint DeterminationFemaleHelicobacter pyloriHumansLactobacillusMaleMiddle AgedProbioticsUreaYoung AdultUreaHelicobacter pyloriprobioticsrandomized double-blind placebo-controlled trialurea breath test

Identifiers

PMID27761791
OpenAlexW2534073533

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.