Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27761746›Full record

ReviewWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2017

Imaging of Paget's disease of bone.

Naomi Winn, Radhesh Lalam, Victor Cassar-Pullicino

Abstract readComparative StudyReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Updates on Paget's Disease of Bone.Endocrinology and metabolism (Seoul, Korea) · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Survey of MRI Usefulness for the Clinical Assessment of Bone Microstructure.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Recent advances in osteoclast biology.Histochemistry and cell biology · 2018
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Naomi WinnThe Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SY10 7AG, Oswestry, Gobowen, UK. naomi.winn@rjah.nhs.uk.
Radhesh LalamThe Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SY10 7AG, Oswestry, Gobowen, UK.
Victor Cassar-PullicinoThe Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, SY10 7AG, Oswestry, Gobowen, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Paget's disease of bone is a disorder of bone remodelling, leading to changes in the architecture and overall appearance of the bone. The disorder may be monostotic or polyostotic and affect any bone in the body, although most commonly it involves the spine, pelvis, skull and femur. This article explores the different imaging modalities used in the assessment of Paget's disease of bone in its different phases. The relative merits of each imaging modality is discussed with illustrative examples, in particular with respect to radiographs, nuclear medicine bone scan, computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

Indexed as

Bone and BonesHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingOsteitis DeformansRadionuclide ImagingSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedCTMRINuclear medicine bone scanPaget’s diseaseRadiographs

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.