Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27761710›Full record

SynthesisEuropean radiology2017

Malignancy rates and diagnostic performance of the Bosniak classification for the diagnosis of cystic renal lesions in computed tomography - a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Sabina Sevcenco, Claudio Spick, Thomas H Helbich, Gertraud Heinz, Shahrokh F Shariat, Hans C Klingler, Michael Rauchenwald, Pascal A Baltzer

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European radiology, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Sabina SevcencoDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Claudio SpickDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, General Hospital Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Thomas H HelbichDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, General Hospital Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria.
Gertraud HeinzDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital of Sankt-Pölten, Propst-Führer-Straße 4, 3100 St., Pölten, Austria.
Shahrokh F ShariatDepartment of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Hans C KlinglerDepartment of Urology, Wilhelminenspital, Montleartstraße 37, 1160, Vienna, Austria.
Michael RauchenwaldDepartment of Urology, Donauspital, Langobardenstraße 122, 1220, Vienna, Austria.
Pascal A BaltzerDepartment of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, General Hospital Vienna, Medical University of Vienna, Währinger Gürtel 18-20, A-1090, Vienna, Austria. pascal.baltzer@meduniwien.ac.at.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo systematically review the literature on the Bosniak classification system in CT to determine its diagnostic performance to diagnose malignant cystic lesions and the prevalence of malignancy in Bosniak categories.

methodsA predefined database search was performed from 1 January 1986 to 18 January 2016. Two independent reviewers extracted data on malignancy rates in Bosniak categories and several covariates using predefined criteria. Study quality was assessed using QUADAS-2. Meta-analysis included data pooling, subgroup analyses, meta-regression and investigation of publication bias.

resultsA total of 35 studies, which included 2,578 lesions, were investigated. Data on observer experience, inter-observer variation and technical CT standards were insufficiently reported. The pooled rate of malignancy increased from Bosniak I (3.2 %, 95 % CI 0-6.8, I

conclusionThe Bosniak classification is an accurate tool with which to stratify the risk of malignancy in renal cystic lesions. KEY POINTS: • The Bosniak classification can accurately rule out malignancy. • Specificity remains moderate at 74 % (95 % CI 64-82). • Follow-up examinations should be considered in Bosniak IIF and Bosniak II cysts. • Data on the influence of reader experience and inter-reader variability are insufficient. • Technical CT standards and publication year did not influence diagnostic performance.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualHumansKidneyKidney Diseases, CysticKidney NeoplasmsObserver VariationPublication BiasQualitative ResearchResearch DesignSensitivity and SpecificityTomography, X-Ray ComputedBosniak classificationKidney cancerMeta-analysisRenal cystsSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID27761710
PMCPMC5408031

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.