Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27761652›Full record

ArticleEuropean archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience2017

Stigmatization of psychiatric symptoms and psychiatric service use: a vignette-based representative population survey.

Julia F Sowislo, Claudia Lange, Sebastian Euler, Henning Hachtel, Marc Walter, Stefan Borgwardt, Undine E Lang, Christian G Huber

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European archives of psychiatry and clinical neuroscience, 2017. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. General and Case-Specific Approval of Coercion in Psychiatry in the Public Opinion.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Observational
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Julia F SowisloUniversitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK), Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, 4012, Basel, Switzerland. julia.sowislo@upkbs.ch.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0132-2226
Claudia LangeUniversitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK), Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, 4012, Basel, Switzerland.
Sebastian EulerUniversitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK), Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, 4012, Basel, Switzerland.
Henning HachtelUniversitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK), Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, 4012, Basel, Switzerland.
Marc WalterUniversitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK), Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, 4012, Basel, Switzerland.
Stefan BorgwardtUniversitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK), Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, 4012, Basel, Switzerland.
Undine E LangUniversitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK), Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, 4012, Basel, Switzerland.
Christian G HuberUniversitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken (UPK), Wilhelm Klein-Str. 27, 4012, Basel, Switzerland.
Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background There is evidence for two different types and/or sources of mental illness stigma, namely the display of psychiatric symptoms and the use of psychiatric service institutions. However, no current study has compared the two. Furthermore, gaps exist in our knowledge of both types of stigma. Little is known about the perceived stigma of specific psychiatric service treatment environments, for instance forensic settings. In addition, systematic research on stigma attached to symptoms of personality disorders in the general population is scarce, and for borderline personality disorder, nonexistent. Methods We conducted a representative survey of the general population (N = 2207) in the canton of Basel-Stadt, Switzerland. Participants were asked to read a vignette depicting either the psychiatric symptoms of a fictitious character or a psychiatric service institution to which the character had been admitted, and indicate desired social distance (an indicator for stigma). Type of symptoms, type of psychiatric service, dangerousness, and gender were systematically varied between vignettes. Findings Desired social distance was significantly lower in relation to psychiatric service use than to psychiatric symptoms. Overall, symptoms of alcohol dependency, behavior endangering others, and the fictitious character's being male tend to increase stigmatization. Interestingly, the character's being hospitalized in a psychiatric unit at a general hospital and also respondent familiarity with psychiatric services tend to decrease stigmatization. Interpretation Familiarity of the general population with psychiatric patients should be increased. Furthermore, treatment in psychiatric units located within general hospitals should be promoted, as such treatment is associated with decreased stigma.

Indexed as

Psychological DistanceSocial StigmaAdolescentAdultFemaleHealth ServicesHealth SurveysHumansInternational Classification of DiseasesLogistic ModelsMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedStereotypingSwitzerlandYoung AdultMental health carePopulation surveyPsychiatric hospitalSocial distanceStigma

Identifiers

PMID27761652
OpenAlexW2535878144

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.