ReviewDer Urologe. Ausg. A2016
[Minimally invasive treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia].
Review in Der Urologe. Ausg. A, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Novel minimally invasive treatment options for the management of male lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) due to bladder outlet obstruction (BOO) aim to provide equal efficacy compared to standard techniques with a more favourable safety profile. The preservation of all aspects of male sexual function including antegrade ejaculation is increasingly important to patients. It should be ideally performed in an outpatient setting under local anesthesia to assure a short recovery time. Novel injectables for intraprostatic application (botulinum neurotoxin A, NX-1207, PRX302) have emerged and first phase III results could not confirm the promising initial data. For mechanical devices like Urolift® the early and mid-term benefits demonstrate a rapid and durable symptom relief without compromising sexual function. Novel innovative procedures like aquablation (AquaBeam®) are entering the scene, but their feasibility, efficacy and safety still need to be addressed in randomized controlled trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.